Skip to content
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]
  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, Massachusetts
Search
Close
Sprawl-busters
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
  • Uncategorized

Citizens Fight Costco Over Relocation Plan

  • Al Norman
  • December 28, 2008
  • No Comments

Residents in Brookfield, Connecticut have organized to block the construction of a Costco warehouse store in their community. Brookfield is a small community (population roughly 16,500). Many of the historic structures in town have been preserved and in 1991 most buildings in Brookfield Center’s Historic District were named to the National Register of Historic Places. The giant retailer Costco currently has a store on Federal Road in Brookfield, but wants to relocate to a bigger store across Junction Road (Route 133) from the Lutheran Church. “Aside from causing traffic stress now with the current store location on Federal Road,” the group Brookfield First writes, “our local Costco seems to be a good commercial neighbor. They pay taxes, keep their property clean, and sell merchandise at good value. Business must be good, because the parking lot is usually full and checkout lines are long. And while we would prefer they solve the parking and traffic problems at their current Federal Road site, they have the right to move their store anywhere legally permitted for that use, as long as they comply with local regulations.” Brookfield First opposes Costco for three reasons: 1) Home real estate values in traffic feeding areas will drop from any megastore on the site; 2) Traffic problems, stress and accidents will sky-rocket; 3) Common sense says: Do not put a megastore across a two lane road from two large churches with schools. Especially when the same road is the major in and out path for school buses carrying kids and home owners going back and forth to work… Here in Connecticut, the process of getting special building and zoning exceptions can be long and arduous. Moving building plans and permits through the various jurisdictional boards, commissions and regulators is done through lawyers, meetings, obtuse documents and negotiations. The issues of wetlands that protect the watershed providing clean water and traffic are key factors in determining what kind of building can be built where. The proposed move to Junction Road appears to need special exceptions from normal land use regulations. So far, the Costco plan seems to have captured the special exceptions needed move through the Brookfield Wetlands Commission successfully. The remaining issue is traffic. A Traffic Impact and Access Study was prepared for Costco. The study quotes traffic rates through the area, accident rates and reviews the real estate taxes for both the current Federal Road Costco site versus the proposed Junction Road site. Not surprisingly, the study estimates tax revenue to Brookfield will increase and any traffic increase is marginal. The traffic conclusion defies common sense, but the geographic map used as the basis of the study is nothing short of amazing… Traffic will be an important part in the phase of COSTCO’s permitting. Because the multi-step permitting process is complex and can move forward without public awareness, it seems a project can move forward by stealth from the public eye. Therefore, it is critical the public become involved in the next step in the Costco approval process: a Zoning Commission public meeting scheduled for January 14, 2009 — 7:00 PM – at Brookfield High School. Please attend to voice your opposition.”

The Brookfield First argument continues: “Planning for the growth of our town has been haphazard at best, and generally influenced by local politicians who cater to the special interests of their friends, family and business associates connected with the commercial and residential real estate industry, a private water company and other businesses that support these constituencies. Costco, in complete disregard for local public opinion and the best interest of the community and its local customers, is seeking to exploit the support of the local politicians and special interest groups, and is proposing to build a larger big-box super store with liquor retail on one of the last remaining historic farm properties in our town thereby destroying the rural character of our community and creating traffic congestion of epic proportions. Don’t be fooled! Don’t let Brookfield’s rural character be forever ruined by a major shopping center in our backyard.” Brookfield First is urging readers to email Costco CEO Jim Sinegal at [email protected] with the following message: “Dear Mr. Sinegal, please cease your company’s actions to develop rural farmland and ruining small communities such as Brookfield, Connecticut. Brookfield has roughly 16,500 people, and does not need a larger store.” Readers can also sign the Brookfield First petition at: http://www.stopcostco.com. Finally, readers are urged to contact Brookfield’s First Selectman, Robert Silvaggi at: [email protected] with the following message: “I urge you to oppose the frivolous relocation of Costco. This scale project is totally incompatible with the small town character of Brookfield. While Costco may consider this a way to gain market share in Brookfield, their project does not mean more jobs or revenue, because they will largely draw their expanded sales from existing merchants, adding little or no value economically to Brookfield. The community gets more traffic, the homes nearby will suffer a decline in value. That’s all you will get. Moving this store a few miles is wasteful of land and resources, and inharmonious with other land uses in the area. I hope you will testify to the Zoning Commission in January that this project is not a good use for the site on Junction Road.”

Like this article?

Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on Linkdin
Share on pinterest
Share on Pinterest
Al Norman

Al Norman

Al Norman first achieved national attention in October of 1993 when he successfully stopped Wal-Mart from locating in his hometown of Greenfield, Massachusetts. Almost 3 decades later they is still not Wal-Mart in Greenfield. Norman has appeared on 60 Minutes, was featured in three films, wrote 3 books about Wal-Mart, and gained widespread media attention from the Wall Street Journal to Fortune magazine. Al has traveled throughout the U.S., Barbados, Puerto Rico, Ireland, and Japan, helping dozens of local coalitions fight off unwanted sprawl development. 60 Minutes called Al “the guru of the anti-Wal-Mart movement.”

Leave a comment

Find Us

  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, MA
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]

Helpful Links

  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
Menu
  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

Recent Posts

CHRISTIAN SMALLS, FIRED AMZN WAREHOUSE WORKER, FILES RACE DISCRIMATION LAWSUIT. …

November 16, 2020

DUE TO THE SURGE IN CORONA CASES, WMT IS LIMITING SHOPPERS TO 5 PER 1,000 SF. A…

November 16, 2020

AMAZON RECENTLY ANNOUNCED FREE 1 HOUR GROCERY PICK UP FOR PRIME MEMBER ORDERS &g…

November 15, 2020

AFTER BEING REJECTED BY THE DEERFIELD, MA PLANNING BOARD, DOLLAR GENERAL APPEALS…

November 15, 2020

WILL TRUMP ALLOW ORACLE & WALMART TO INVEST IN TIK TOK? The deadline to ban …

November 14, 2020

AMAZON ACCUSED OF BREAKING ANTITRUST RULES IN EUROPE. “Data of 3rd-party sellers…

November 14, 2020

WALMART PET CARE NOW SELLING PET INSURANCE. My 3 year old mixed breed cat would …

November 13, 2020

WALMART’S GOING TO THE DOGS. 90 M OF ITS CUSTOMERS HAVE DOGS. You’d be Goofy not…

November 13, 2020

WALMART CASHIERS STILL LOOKING FOR A SEAT. They won a $65 M lawsuit in 2019, but…

November 12, 2020

4 DAYS BEFORE THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION,THE CO-FOUNDER OF HOME DEPOT SAID: “Pres…

November 12, 2020

Recent Tweets

Al Norman 20 hours ago

UNION FILES NLRB COMPLAINT that AMZN interfered with right of warehouse employees to a “free & fair election,” & interfered with right of employees to engage in union activity. AMZN challenged 500 votes—so the result was far closer than described. https://t.co/bKKCcciG5S

Read More
Al Norman 20 hours ago

AFTER AMAZON’S VICTORY OVER THE UNION, “if policymakers do not reform our nation’s labor law system, then they are effectively denying workers a meaningful right to a union & collective bargaining.’' AMZN actually brags about a wage of $15.30hr. https://t.co/qbsjyNB1Ri

Read More
Al Norman 2 days ago

COURT MAKES WMT PAY $115 M TO LAB which “uses sensors to track perishable food shipments...through the supply chain to the store shelves,” measuring freshness. Lab sued WMT for stealing its technology to create its own version. https://t.co/UW3fIt2qDu

Read More

Ⓒ 2020 - All Rights Are Reserved

Design and Development by Just Peachy Web Design

Download Our Free Guide

Download our Free Guide

Learn How To Stop Big Box Stores And Fulfillment Warehouses In Your Community

The strategies written here were produced by Sprawl-Busters in 2006 at the request of the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), mainly for citizen groups that were fighting Walmart. But the tips for fighting unwanted development apply to any project—whether its fighting Dollar General, an Amazon warehouse, or a Home Depot.

Big projects, or small, these BATTLEMART TIPS will help you better understand what you are up against, and how to win your battle.