Skip to content
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]
  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, Massachusetts
Search
Close
Sprawl-busters
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
  • Uncategorized

City Council Rejects Wal-Mart Annexation.

  • Al Norman
  • January 14, 2019
  • No Comments

The City Council in Rice Lake, Wisconsin has sunk Wal-Mart plans to build a new store on 44 acres just outside the city. The annexation vote needed a three-fourths vote to pass (six of eight councilors) — but only got a 5-3 count. An overflow crowd of more than 80 people against the project watched as the 195,000 s.f. Wal-Mart plan was submerged. The land Wal-Mart coveted is in the town of Rice Lake, but it needed to be annexed into the city of Rice Lake, because the city does not extend water and sewer service outside the city. According to the Rice Lake Chronotype newspaper, residents against the annexation argued that the project would create sprawl, storm water runoff problems, traffic problems, and that it would shift the city’s business district away from the central city while hurting existing jobs at smaller retailers. Rachel Carlson, a Councilor who spoke against the plan before the vote, said she wanted to see an independent economic impact study on the effect of a Supercenter here. “I want to be sure of what I’m voting on,” she said. “I’ve talked to a whole lot of folks out there that are really concerned about their small business.” Another interesting feature of the Rice Lake situation is that Wal-Mart has an existing store here. Under a proposed developer’s agreement, Wal-Mart would have to pay $18,700 if its existing building stood empty for over 1 year. A former Mayor warned that a Wal-Mart supercenter could tax police capacity, and “A second fire station will become a reality, at a cost of probably millions.” Under the proposed developer’s agreement, public improvements wouldn’t be extended unless the annexation was successful and the Town of Rice Lake agreed not to contest the annexation. If there was a lawsuit contesting the annexation, Wal-Mart would be responsible for the city’s legal costs. Wal-Mart agreed to pay, either upfront or in a letter of credit, about $1,559,400 for all necessary public improvements. Wal-Mart also agreed to make a payment in lieu of taxes should the current facility be vacant for more than 1 year, to provide an incentive for Wal-Mart to find occupants for the empty building. Wal-Mart also agreed not restrict any retailer, even a competitor, from occupying the current Wal-Mart store — which is a departure from their usual requirement that their empty stores not become available to competitors. The land Wal-Mart wanted had been farmed for 100 years. The family that owned the farm decided to sell the farm for commercial use. At the hearings, Wal-Mart brought in its current store manager, who said the Rice Lake store was operating at the maximum capacity of its 125,000 square feet. He said the existing store had 324 employees-214 full time, 110 part time. The City’s Administrator gave a cost-benefit analysis of the Wal-Mart, looking at costs the to the city, costs to other taxing jurisdictions such as the school district and the county, and the overall benefit, if any, to Rice Lake and the surrounding region. He said the city needs about $650,000 in development per acre to receive enough property taxes to pay the bills. He said currently Wal-Mart pays about $57,000 in real estate and personal property taxes, and that it costs about $88,000 per year in municipal services for the store, netting a loss of about $30,000 per year to the city. He said the new store will pay about $90,000 in taxes while requiring about $138,000 per year in services, which will result in an even larger loss. But that loss would be offset, he said, by increased sales tax revenues to the county — which also benefit the City of Rice Lake. The City Administrator said because city residents are about 20% of the county, city residents will benefit by about $30,000 in county tax revenues. But that still leaves the project a financial loser, and doesn’t count the loss of revenue from other businesses in the city which close down. “This type of development expands the economy, puts more jobs into the area,” he was quoted by the Chronotype as saying. But when the debate was over, Wal-Mart failed to come up with enough votes to annex the land.

The economics here are not very compelling. City officials admitted that revenues did not cover the city expenses of servicing the supercenter, and the existing store was in danger of remaining vacant for years. In the end, Rice Lake was not convinced enough to annex the land away from the town.

Like this article?

Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on Linkdin
Share on pinterest
Share on Pinterest
Al Norman

Al Norman

Al Norman first achieved national attention in October of 1993 when he successfully stopped Wal-Mart from locating in his hometown of Greenfield, Massachusetts. Almost 3 decades later they is still not Wal-Mart in Greenfield. Norman has appeared on 60 Minutes, was featured in three films, wrote 3 books about Wal-Mart, and gained widespread media attention from the Wall Street Journal to Fortune magazine. Al has traveled throughout the U.S., Barbados, Puerto Rico, Ireland, and Japan, helping dozens of local coalitions fight off unwanted sprawl development. 60 Minutes called Al “the guru of the anti-Wal-Mart movement.”

Leave a comment

Find Us

  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, MA
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]

Helpful Links

  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
Menu
  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

Recent Posts

CHRISTIAN SMALLS, FIRED AMZN WAREHOUSE WORKER, FILES RACE DISCRIMATION LAWSUIT. …

November 16, 2020

DUE TO THE SURGE IN CORONA CASES, WMT IS LIMITING SHOPPERS TO 5 PER 1,000 SF. A…

November 16, 2020

AMAZON RECENTLY ANNOUNCED FREE 1 HOUR GROCERY PICK UP FOR PRIME MEMBER ORDERS &g…

November 15, 2020

AFTER BEING REJECTED BY THE DEERFIELD, MA PLANNING BOARD, DOLLAR GENERAL APPEALS…

November 15, 2020

WILL TRUMP ALLOW ORACLE & WALMART TO INVEST IN TIK TOK? The deadline to ban …

November 14, 2020

AMAZON ACCUSED OF BREAKING ANTITRUST RULES IN EUROPE. “Data of 3rd-party sellers…

November 14, 2020

WALMART PET CARE NOW SELLING PET INSURANCE. My 3 year old mixed breed cat would …

November 13, 2020

WALMART’S GOING TO THE DOGS. 90 M OF ITS CUSTOMERS HAVE DOGS. You’d be Goofy not…

November 13, 2020

WALMART CASHIERS STILL LOOKING FOR A SEAT. They won a $65 M lawsuit in 2019, but…

November 12, 2020

4 DAYS BEFORE THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION,THE CO-FOUNDER OF HOME DEPOT SAID: “Pres…

November 12, 2020

Recent Tweets

Al Norman 13 hours ago

NYTIMES The Morning: “Uber, PayPal & Walgreens will provide free rides for people to get to vaccination sites. Best Buy, Dollar General & Target will give their workers paid time off to get a shot.” Is that as good as it gets? https://t.co/buuyfUBzN1

Read More
Al Norman 13 hours ago

USELESS reporting: “In its most recent quarter while WMT as a whole grew 7.3%, its ecommerce sales advanced 69%.” WMT never reveals its level of ecommerce sales, so % growth is an empty comparison point since total sales are of vastly different scale. https://t.co/WEVyx6ToyK

Read More
Al Norman 14 hours ago

@Walmart Make him a Walton so he can be part of America’s richest family. Just don’t tell your 2.2 million other workers—who don’t buy Pokémon toys because the rent is overdue.

Read More

Ⓒ 2020 - All Rights Are Reserved

Design and Development by Just Peachy Web Design

Download Our Free Guide

Download our Free Guide

Learn How To Stop Big Box Stores And Fulfillment Warehouses In Your Community

The strategies written here were produced by Sprawl-Busters in 2006 at the request of the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), mainly for citizen groups that were fighting Walmart. But the tips for fighting unwanted development apply to any project—whether its fighting Dollar General, an Amazon warehouse, or a Home Depot.

Big projects, or small, these BATTLEMART TIPS will help you better understand what you are up against, and how to win your battle.