Skip to content
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]
  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, Massachusetts
Search
Close
Sprawl-busters
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
  • Uncategorized

City Officials Reject Wal-Mart’s Ballot Question

  • Al Norman
  • July 6, 2007
  • No Comments

Two days ago, Sprawl-Busters updated a story from Tucson, Arizona about Wal-Mart’s funding of a ballot campaign to overturn the city’s big box ordinance that limits store size. Tucson has had a big box law since 1999, and Wal-Mart filed a lawsuit several years ago to have it declared unconstitutional — but lost. Wal-Mart hired a local consultant to pay signature gatherers to put the initiative petition on this November’s ballot. In that story, we suggested that city officials might reject Wal-Mart’s petition on legal grounds — and that’s exactly what the city did. Yesterday afternoon the petition was rejected by Tucson city Clerk Kathleen Detrick, who explained that Arizona law prevents initiatives from targeting land-use code such as the big-box ordinance. The city law that Wal-Mart says limits “consumer choice” is a zoning ordinance that limits the space dedicated to grocery sales in retail stores greater than or equal to 100,000 s.f. to no more than 10% of floor space. The law is similar to those passed in other states, most notably California. Wal-Mart’s hired signature gatherers collected 21,934 signatures, twice as many as the 11,615 required for a ballot question. Tucson’s city lawyer communicated with Wal-Mart’s lawyers, and told The Tucson Citizen that he expects Wal-Mart to go to court to get their question on the ballot. The city asserts that state law prohibits ballot initiatives from targeting zoning ordinances because it circumvents the zoning process, including public hearings required by state law. Arizona law allows citizens to challenge a zoning ordinance on the ballot — but it must be done a month before the code goes into effect, not after. Wal-Mart is expected to take legal action promptly now that the city has rejected its petition.

The city has agreed with the attorneys from the United Food and Commercial Workers in this case. The union said Wal-Mart’s petition drive was not allowed under state law. Wal-Mart said recently that it would not have proceeded with the signature gathering if it were not certain that the effort was legal. Now, the retailer will be forced to spend more legal fees to challenge Tucson once again in court. Wal-Mart is busy suing Tucson, rather than trying to find a way to sell underwear and bananas. Years go by, with no new store in place. The climate surrounding the construction of new superstores has become so charged across the country, that what used to be a perfunctory process, has now led to court battles and months — if not years — of delays. Wal-Mart gets the worst of this situation, but other big box retailers like Home Depot, Target and Lowe’s also face similar challenges. Wal-Mart shareholders should be asking corporate leaders why their stores spawn such controversy, and ask how the company could lower its profile, shrink its footprint, and enter communities like Tucson without all the legal background noise. Tucson shows how far Wal-Mart has strayed from being just a retailer. Now the corporation has become a cultural symbol of uncontrolled growth, and irresponsible development. As a result, its store growth is being stymied, and many stores the company planned on producing in 2008, will now not come on line until 2009 — assuming they survive the political gauntlet. Even after years of confrontation, no one at Wal-Mart seems inclined to change its method of operating at the local level. Rather than work with the “locals,” Wal-Mart seems content to try to crush them. In so doing, they are wasting corporate time and money. “Why all the opposition,” one former Wal-Mart official said. “We’re not a nuclear waste dump.” For earlier stories, search Newsflash by “Tucson.”

Like this article?

Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on Linkdin
Share on pinterest
Share on Pinterest
Al Norman

Al Norman

Al Norman first achieved national attention in October of 1993 when he successfully stopped Wal-Mart from locating in his hometown of Greenfield, Massachusetts. Almost 3 decades later they is still not Wal-Mart in Greenfield. Norman has appeared on 60 Minutes, was featured in three films, wrote 3 books about Wal-Mart, and gained widespread media attention from the Wall Street Journal to Fortune magazine. Al has traveled throughout the U.S., Barbados, Puerto Rico, Ireland, and Japan, helping dozens of local coalitions fight off unwanted sprawl development. 60 Minutes called Al “the guru of the anti-Wal-Mart movement.”

Leave a comment

Find Us

  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, MA
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]

Helpful Links

  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
Menu
  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

Recent Posts

CHRISTIAN SMALLS, FIRED AMZN WAREHOUSE WORKER, FILES RACE DISCRIMATION LAWSUIT. …

November 16, 2020

DUE TO THE SURGE IN CORONA CASES, WMT IS LIMITING SHOPPERS TO 5 PER 1,000 SF. A…

November 16, 2020

AMAZON RECENTLY ANNOUNCED FREE 1 HOUR GROCERY PICK UP FOR PRIME MEMBER ORDERS &g…

November 15, 2020

AFTER BEING REJECTED BY THE DEERFIELD, MA PLANNING BOARD, DOLLAR GENERAL APPEALS…

November 15, 2020

WILL TRUMP ALLOW ORACLE & WALMART TO INVEST IN TIK TOK? The deadline to ban …

November 14, 2020

AMAZON ACCUSED OF BREAKING ANTITRUST RULES IN EUROPE. “Data of 3rd-party sellers…

November 14, 2020

WALMART PET CARE NOW SELLING PET INSURANCE. My 3 year old mixed breed cat would …

November 13, 2020

WALMART’S GOING TO THE DOGS. 90 M OF ITS CUSTOMERS HAVE DOGS. You’d be Goofy not…

November 13, 2020

WALMART CASHIERS STILL LOOKING FOR A SEAT. They won a $65 M lawsuit in 2019, but…

November 12, 2020

4 DAYS BEFORE THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION,THE CO-FOUNDER OF HOME DEPOT SAID: “Pres…

November 12, 2020

Recent Tweets

Al Norman 12 hours ago

HOME DEPOT FOLLOWING AMAZON’S PLAYBOOK. Every word in this press release could have been written by Jeff Bezos. More huge fulfillment center sprawl. https://t.co/ncaye2SJC8

Read More
Al Norman 12 hours ago

FED JUDGE TOSSES OUT WALMART LAWSUIT, WHICH SOUGHT TO TOSS OUT A DOJ LAWSUIT CHARGING WMT FILLED THOUSANDS OF INVALID OPIOID RXS. Walmart feels the pain. https://t.co/r1pwZE7ERL

Read More
Al Norman 1 day ago

TWO BILLBOARDS, in Texas & Missouri, calling on voters to urge Congress to EXPEL SENS. TED CRUZ & JOSH HAWLEY “for inciting insurrection [of Jan. 6] against America and voting to overturn our democratic election.” https://t.co/tzZ6ggpj9C

Read More

Ⓒ 2020 - All Rights Are Reserved

Design and Development by Just Peachy Web Design

Download Our Free Guide

Download our Free Guide

Learn How To Stop Big Box Stores And Fulfillment Warehouses In Your Community

The strategies written here were produced by Sprawl-Busters in 2006 at the request of the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), mainly for citizen groups that were fighting Walmart. But the tips for fighting unwanted development apply to any project—whether its fighting Dollar General, an Amazon warehouse, or a Home Depot.

Big projects, or small, these BATTLEMART TIPS will help you better understand what you are up against, and how to win your battle.