Skip to content
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]
  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, Massachusetts
Search
Close
Sprawl-busters
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
  • Uncategorized

City To Vote On Waterfront Wal-Mart

  • Al Norman
  • September 26, 2006
  • No Comments

There’s nothing like a Wal-Mart by the water’s edge: the shimmering shadow of its vast, blank walls, the reflected neon of its white logo, the auto exhaust gently comingling with the mists by the water’s edge. It’s enough to quicken the pulse of any City Council member in Vallejo, California. But wait. City officials, who are expected to vote on the plan this evening, have apparently objected to Wal-Mart’s proposal, saying that a huge superstore would violate the city’s land use plan for the area. Wal-Mart has submitted a 206,000 s.f.superstore on just under 13 acres of land, where a Kmart once stood. The land is next to the White Slough, a body of water with a marsh that runs into the Napa River. Wal-Mart paid little attention to the fact that their proposal flies in the face of the White Slough Specific Area Plan, developed by the city, which requires a much less intense use of the land, including clustered buildings, open space onto the water, with windows, terraces and entryways that front on the water. In other words, a plan that maximizes the scenic value of a waterfront, rather than blockading it from public use with a big box the size of four footballs fields. The city’s staff has recommended that the Council require Wal-Mart to study the impacts of the project. Various other stores in the proposed complex bring the entire plan to 393,000 s.f. The project would sit atop a first floor garage which occupies nearly half of the project’s total square footage, because with only 13 acres, the project must build up, not out. Two of the seven City Councilors have already come out against the plan. The superstore will cause the existing Wal-Mart discount store in Vallejo to shut down. This is Wal-Mart’s second attempt to build a supercenter in Vallejo. The first version, according to the San Francisco Chronicle, was 160,000 s.f. When local officials threw that plan out because of conflicts with the White Slough, Wal-Mart came back with an even bigger project. By way of changes, Wal-Mart turned the building to face the water, so shoppers sorting through cheap underwear and diapers, could take in views of the water. The 173,000 s.f. parking area on the first floor is almost as big as the supercenter itself. To top it off, Wal-Mart added arched entries to break the visual boredom of the typical Wal-Mart box. But a citizens group called Vallejoans for Responsible Growth, said the new plan was “a finger in our eye. They are being terribly arrogant and disrespectful of Vallejo. They assume we’re poor and stupid and they can push through whatever they want.” The Council may decide tonight whether it wants to amend the specific plan to allow for a Wal-Mart. Were the Council to do that, Wal-Mart would pay for a consultant hired by the city to produce detailed analyses, but the city would not be committed to approving the proposed development. The city’s planner has asked for a one-year development moratorium in the area, pending consideration of whether to change the specific plan. But the Council has a third option as well: to reject the proposal outright. That would be consistent with the Council’s vote last year to require big box stores to conduct economic and environmental impact studies. “I think it’s going to crush our downtown revitalization,” one city councilor told the newspaper. Vallejo has already spent millions of dollars to restore its historic downtown.

City officials know this plan is the wrong size, and the wrong place. They would have to change their land use plan for the waterfront in order to approve this project. Wal-Mart should be made to fit the city’s plans, not the reverse. All Vallejo gets out of this plan is an empty Wal-Mart discount store. The city already has plenty of grocery stores. So Wal-Mart’s waterfront project is all wet. It brings no added value to the Vallejo economy.

Like this article?

Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on Linkdin
Share on pinterest
Share on Pinterest
Al Norman

Al Norman

Al Norman first achieved national attention in October of 1993 when he successfully stopped Wal-Mart from locating in his hometown of Greenfield, Massachusetts. Almost 3 decades later they is still not Wal-Mart in Greenfield. Norman has appeared on 60 Minutes, was featured in three films, wrote 3 books about Wal-Mart, and gained widespread media attention from the Wall Street Journal to Fortune magazine. Al has traveled throughout the U.S., Barbados, Puerto Rico, Ireland, and Japan, helping dozens of local coalitions fight off unwanted sprawl development. 60 Minutes called Al “the guru of the anti-Wal-Mart movement.”

Leave a comment

Find Us

  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, MA
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]

Helpful Links

  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
Menu
  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

Recent Posts

CHRISTIAN SMALLS, FIRED AMZN WAREHOUSE WORKER, FILES RACE DISCRIMATION LAWSUIT. …

November 16, 2020

DUE TO THE SURGE IN CORONA CASES, WMT IS LIMITING SHOPPERS TO 5 PER 1,000 SF. A…

November 16, 2020

AMAZON RECENTLY ANNOUNCED FREE 1 HOUR GROCERY PICK UP FOR PRIME MEMBER ORDERS &g…

November 15, 2020

AFTER BEING REJECTED BY THE DEERFIELD, MA PLANNING BOARD, DOLLAR GENERAL APPEALS…

November 15, 2020

WILL TRUMP ALLOW ORACLE & WALMART TO INVEST IN TIK TOK? The deadline to ban …

November 14, 2020

AMAZON ACCUSED OF BREAKING ANTITRUST RULES IN EUROPE. “Data of 3rd-party sellers…

November 14, 2020

WALMART PET CARE NOW SELLING PET INSURANCE. My 3 year old mixed breed cat would …

November 13, 2020

WALMART’S GOING TO THE DOGS. 90 M OF ITS CUSTOMERS HAVE DOGS. You’d be Goofy not…

November 13, 2020

WALMART CASHIERS STILL LOOKING FOR A SEAT. They won a $65 M lawsuit in 2019, but…

November 12, 2020

4 DAYS BEFORE THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION,THE CO-FOUNDER OF HOME DEPOT SAID: “Pres…

November 12, 2020

Recent Tweets

Al Norman 6 hours ago

HALF OF THE ALABAMA AMZN warehouse workers did not vote: 3,036 votes were cast out of 5,876 eligible voters. 30% of eligible voters were anti-union—but 2,840 didn’t vote—apathy, or scared they’d be fired. https://t.co/RcLWGxXZez

Read More
Al Norman 6 hours ago

WALMART WANTS TO REPLACE closed McDonald’s & Subway stores with “new & exciting brands” like Domino’s & Taco Bell. Since when is corporate pizza new or exciting? https://t.co/P7mx2To9m6

Read More
Al Norman 1 day ago

UNION FILES NLRB COMPLAINT that AMZN interfered with right of warehouse employees to a “free & fair election,” & interfered with right of employees to engage in union activity. AMZN challenged 500 votes—so the result was far closer than described. https://t.co/bKKCcciG5S

Read More

Ⓒ 2020 - All Rights Are Reserved

Design and Development by Just Peachy Web Design

Download Our Free Guide

Download our Free Guide

Learn How To Stop Big Box Stores And Fulfillment Warehouses In Your Community

The strategies written here were produced by Sprawl-Busters in 2006 at the request of the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), mainly for citizen groups that were fighting Walmart. But the tips for fighting unwanted development apply to any project—whether its fighting Dollar General, an Amazon warehouse, or a Home Depot.

Big projects, or small, these BATTLEMART TIPS will help you better understand what you are up against, and how to win your battle.