Skip to content
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]
  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, Massachusetts
Search
Close
Sprawl-busters
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
  • Uncategorized

Home Depot Annexation Battle Nears Conclusion

  • Al Norman
  • April 30, 2006
  • No Comments

Citizens of El Cajon, California took to the streets this weekend to protest a proposed Home Depot in their community. Residents lined the street as local TV stations recorded their demonstration for the evening news. According to a report submitted by anti Home Depot leaders, “Our battle against Home Depot in El Cajon, CA comes to a showdown vote Monday, May 1st, as the San Diego Local Agency Formation Commission, which must approve all annexations, will vote. Their staff is recommending DENIAL….so we are cautiously optimistic, but we are gathering more than 100 people to be there and we are holding a rally Saturday. We had a great turnout of residents, approximately 125 or so.” Home Depot is trying to get approval to have land east of the city annexed into El Cajon. The LAFCO will vote on this project tomorrow morning. “This is by far the most controversial and contentious city annexation we’ve dealt with,” Mike Ott, the commission’s executive officer told the Union-Tribune. The commission has to decide if the city of El Cajon is able to provide adequate municipal services, such as fire protection, to the 14 acre site. The land is currently part of the county. Home Depot already owns the land, and has the El Cajon City Council in its orange vest. The Council rejected Home Depot’s plans six years ago, but this go round were more compliant. The Commission will look at whether or not the land is “substantially surrounded” by the city. The Commission’s staff have said in a 33 page report that the land is not surrounded, the City Council says it is. The city claims the land is 68% surrounded by El Cajon. “The law does not contain a specific percentage for what may be defined as substantially surrounded,” a LAFCO’s Ott told the newspaper. The LAFCO report noted, “while state law encourages the elimination of islands and substantially surrounded territory, it also would be irresponsible to ignore the concerns expressed by over 1,000 people.” Home Depot argues that annexation is not a popularity contest, admitting that their plans are unpopular with many people. “This piece of property has no access except through the city of El Cajon,” a Home Depot spokesman said. Residents counter that a big box store is out of scale for the neighborhood, and will only attract traffic, noise and air pollution. They note that the county’s land use plan lists this property for residential use. “We are all very impressed at the depth and scope and the comprehensive nature of the (LAFCO) review and that they actually looked at all the concerns we’ve been discussing,” Cliff Albert, a local radio commentator who lives in the Olive Hills neighborhood, told the Union-Tribune. The annexation is opposed by the county, local planners, and the Lakeside Fire Protection District. The county sued the city in court over the annexation, but the case was dimissed on a technical point, not on the merits of the case. The Fire Protection District is concerned that it will lose tax revenue while continuing to have to protect the big box store. Several Home Depot stores have caught fire, and when they do, they create a hazmat fire because of all nature of flammable and combustible materials warehoused in large quantities inside the store.

Whatever the decision on Monday, it is likely this case will end up in court. If Home Depot does not get its annexation, it will sue. If residents are denied, they will likely appeal to the courts. That means there will be no Home Depot in El Cajon in the near future. To see an earlier story about this case, search Newsflash by “El Cajon.”

Like this article?

Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on Linkdin
Share on pinterest
Share on Pinterest
Al Norman

Al Norman

Al Norman first achieved national attention in October of 1993 when he successfully stopped Wal-Mart from locating in his hometown of Greenfield, Massachusetts. Almost 3 decades later they is still not Wal-Mart in Greenfield. Norman has appeared on 60 Minutes, was featured in three films, wrote 3 books about Wal-Mart, and gained widespread media attention from the Wall Street Journal to Fortune magazine. Al has traveled throughout the U.S., Barbados, Puerto Rico, Ireland, and Japan, helping dozens of local coalitions fight off unwanted sprawl development. 60 Minutes called Al “the guru of the anti-Wal-Mart movement.”

Leave a comment

Find Us

  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, MA
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]

Helpful Links

  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
Menu
  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

Recent Posts

CHRISTIAN SMALLS, FIRED AMZN WAREHOUSE WORKER, FILES RACE DISCRIMATION LAWSUIT. …

November 16, 2020

DUE TO THE SURGE IN CORONA CASES, WMT IS LIMITING SHOPPERS TO 5 PER 1,000 SF. A…

November 16, 2020

AMAZON RECENTLY ANNOUNCED FREE 1 HOUR GROCERY PICK UP FOR PRIME MEMBER ORDERS &g…

November 15, 2020

AFTER BEING REJECTED BY THE DEERFIELD, MA PLANNING BOARD, DOLLAR GENERAL APPEALS…

November 15, 2020

WILL TRUMP ALLOW ORACLE & WALMART TO INVEST IN TIK TOK? The deadline to ban …

November 14, 2020

AMAZON ACCUSED OF BREAKING ANTITRUST RULES IN EUROPE. “Data of 3rd-party sellers…

November 14, 2020

WALMART PET CARE NOW SELLING PET INSURANCE. My 3 year old mixed breed cat would …

November 13, 2020

WALMART’S GOING TO THE DOGS. 90 M OF ITS CUSTOMERS HAVE DOGS. You’d be Goofy not…

November 13, 2020

WALMART CASHIERS STILL LOOKING FOR A SEAT. They won a $65 M lawsuit in 2019, but…

November 12, 2020

4 DAYS BEFORE THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION,THE CO-FOUNDER OF HOME DEPOT SAID: “Pres…

November 12, 2020

Recent Tweets

Al Norman 3 hours ago

HALF OF THE ALABAMA AMZN warehouse workers did not vote: 3,036 votes were cast out of 5,876 eligible voters. 30% of eligible voters were anti-union—but 2,840 didn’t vote—apathy, or scared they’d be fired. https://t.co/RcLWGxXZez

Read More
Al Norman 3 hours ago

WALMART WANTS TO REPLACE closed McDonald’s & Subway stores with “new & exciting brands” like Domino’s & Taco Bell. Since when is corporate pizza new or exciting? https://t.co/P7mx2To9m6

Read More
Al Norman 1 day ago

UNION FILES NLRB COMPLAINT that AMZN interfered with right of warehouse employees to a “free & fair election,” & interfered with right of employees to engage in union activity. AMZN challenged 500 votes—so the result was far closer than described. https://t.co/bKKCcciG5S

Read More

Ⓒ 2020 - All Rights Are Reserved

Design and Development by Just Peachy Web Design

Download Our Free Guide

Download our Free Guide

Learn How To Stop Big Box Stores And Fulfillment Warehouses In Your Community

The strategies written here were produced by Sprawl-Busters in 2006 at the request of the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), mainly for citizen groups that were fighting Walmart. But the tips for fighting unwanted development apply to any project—whether its fighting Dollar General, an Amazon warehouse, or a Home Depot.

Big projects, or small, these BATTLEMART TIPS will help you better understand what you are up against, and how to win your battle.