Skip to content
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]
  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, Massachusetts
Search
Close
Sprawl-busters
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
  • Uncategorized

Hundreds of Homeowners Sign Petition To Block Wal-Mart Superstore

  • Al Norman
  • July 6, 2014
  • No Comments

Sprawl-Busters heard this week from unhappy residents in the city of Mansfield, Texas, who don’t want another Wal-Mart superstore in their community. According to the Mansfield News-Mirror, homeowners in Mansfield are set to do battle with the world’s largest retailer.

Mansfield is located in south central portion of the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex. The city is 30 minutes from DFW International Airport, and offers easy access to Dallas, Fort Worth and other cities in the North Texas region. The city’s population is just under 58,000 people. The city is already saturated with 18 Wal-Mart stores within 15 miles, including a superstore in Mansfield on North Walnut Creek Road, and 7 other Wal-Mart superstores only minutes away.

Leaders from as many as 8 different home-owners associations along North Holland Road and East Broad Street in Mansfield have circulated a petition against a 175,000-square-foot Wal-Mart superstore. The 20 acre site chosen by Wal-Mart just happens to be incorrectly zoned—which to the giant retailer is a minor detail.

The parcel is bordered on three sides by single family home developments, with a middle school and two other schools nearby. The homeowners worry that a huge superstore will lower property values, and raise traffic and crime. To date, more than 1,400 residents have signed a petition to keep Wal-Mart out. Residents have also started a website at www.stopthenewWalmart.com

“We’re not against the commercial rezoning of that land,” the president of the Meadow Glen homeowners association told the News-Mirror. “We’re against the big-box, 24-hour retail at that intersection. The homes here belong to people who wanted to move away from traffic like that.”

Residents told Sprawl-Busters this week that Wal-Mart has not yet submitted anything in writing to the city. The city’s Planning Director told the newspaper a rezoning application from Wal-Mart will be submitted this month. It will then go before the city’s Planning and Zoning Commission, with the final say resting in the hands of the City Council. That means residents need to get at least 4 members of the City Council to vote against rezoning.

Under section 8600 of the City’s Zoning Ordinance, landowners can ask for a zoning “amendment” to reclassify their property. The zoning ordinance itself does not state the criteria that the Planning and Zoning Commission is supposed to use when making a decision to approve or disapprove of a zoning amendment. In section 6100, the Ordinance lays out the conditions for granting a specific use permit: 1. That the specific use permit will be compatible with and not injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property, nor significantly diminish or impair property values within the immediate vicinity; 2. That the establishment of the specific use permit will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding vacant property; 3. That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and other necessary supporting facilities have been or will be provided; 4. The design, location and arrangement of all driveways and parking spaces provides for the safe and convenient movement of vehicular and pedestrian traffic without adversely affecting the general public or adjacent developments; 5. That adequate nuisance prevention measures have been or will be taken to prevent or control offensive odor, fumes, dust, noise and vibration; 6. That directional lighting will be provided so as not to disturb or adversely affect neighboring properties; 7. That there are sufficient landscaping and screening to insure harmony and compatibility with adjacent property.

The City Planning and Zoning Commission can also recommend to the City Council certain safeguards and conditions that require such development standards and operational conditions and safeguards as are indicated to be important to the welfare and protection of adjacent property and the community as a whole.

Planning and Zoning, and the City Council, have plenty of reasons to reject this inharmonious land use.

Readers are urged to contact Mansfield, Texas Mayor David L. Cook at: [email protected] with the following message:

“Dear Mayor Cook,

The parcel that Wal-Mart wants to build another superstore on is too close to abutting single family residences and schools. A project of this scale will have negative impacts on residential values—the largest single investment made by residents in your city.

The size of a Wal-Mart superstore will be injurious to the use and enjoyment of their homes. This proposed use is also incompatible with the Mansfield land use plan, which calls for this property to be use for residential purposes.

Wal-Mart’s proposal is inharmonious and incompatible with neighboring uses. Land use decisions should create a ‘win/win’ situation, not a “lose/win” situation. Under Wal-Mart’s scenario, they win, and the neighbors lose. No amendment to this parcel should be allowed that will result in financial harm to the abutters.

You already have 18 Wal-Mart’s within 15 miles of Mansfield, including a supercenter already within city limits. Your market area is saturated with Wal-Marts, and another store will only kill off smaller local competitors, and bring you no new jobs or taxes. For this, nearby homeowners will suffer.”

Sprawl-Busters heard this week from unhappy residents in the city of Mansfield, Texas, who don’t want another Wal-Mart superstore in their community. According to the Mansfield News-Mirror, homeowners in Mansfield are set to do battle with the world’s largest retailer.

Like this article?

Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on Linkdin
Share on pinterest
Share on Pinterest
Al Norman

Al Norman

Al Norman first achieved national attention in October of 1993 when he successfully stopped Wal-Mart from locating in his hometown of Greenfield, Massachusetts. Almost 3 decades later they is still not Wal-Mart in Greenfield. Norman has appeared on 60 Minutes, was featured in three films, wrote 3 books about Wal-Mart, and gained widespread media attention from the Wall Street Journal to Fortune magazine. Al has traveled throughout the U.S., Barbados, Puerto Rico, Ireland, and Japan, helping dozens of local coalitions fight off unwanted sprawl development. 60 Minutes called Al “the guru of the anti-Wal-Mart movement.”

Leave a comment

Find Us

  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, MA
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]

Helpful Links

  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
Menu
  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

Recent Posts

CHRISTIAN SMALLS, FIRED AMZN WAREHOUSE WORKER, FILES RACE DISCRIMATION LAWSUIT. …

November 16, 2020

DUE TO THE SURGE IN CORONA CASES, WMT IS LIMITING SHOPPERS TO 5 PER 1,000 SF. A…

November 16, 2020

AMAZON RECENTLY ANNOUNCED FREE 1 HOUR GROCERY PICK UP FOR PRIME MEMBER ORDERS &g…

November 15, 2020

AFTER BEING REJECTED BY THE DEERFIELD, MA PLANNING BOARD, DOLLAR GENERAL APPEALS…

November 15, 2020

WILL TRUMP ALLOW ORACLE & WALMART TO INVEST IN TIK TOK? The deadline to ban …

November 14, 2020

AMAZON ACCUSED OF BREAKING ANTITRUST RULES IN EUROPE. “Data of 3rd-party sellers…

November 14, 2020

WALMART PET CARE NOW SELLING PET INSURANCE. My 3 year old mixed breed cat would …

November 13, 2020

WALMART’S GOING TO THE DOGS. 90 M OF ITS CUSTOMERS HAVE DOGS. You’d be Goofy not…

November 13, 2020

WALMART CASHIERS STILL LOOKING FOR A SEAT. They won a $65 M lawsuit in 2019, but…

November 12, 2020

4 DAYS BEFORE THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION,THE CO-FOUNDER OF HOME DEPOT SAID: “Pres…

November 12, 2020

Recent Tweets

Al Norman 1 hour ago

HALF OF THE ALABAMA AMZN warehouse workers did not vote: 3,036 votes were cast out of 5,876 eligible voters. 30% of eligible voters were anti-union—but 2,840 didn’t vote—apathy, or scared they’d be fired. https://t.co/RcLWGxXZez

Read More
Al Norman 1 hour ago

WALMART WANTS TO REPLACE closed McDonald’s & Subway stores with “new & exciting brands” like Domino’s & Taco Bell. Since when is corporate pizza new or exciting? https://t.co/P7mx2To9m6

Read More
Al Norman 1 day ago

UNION FILES NLRB COMPLAINT that AMZN interfered with right of warehouse employees to a “free & fair election,” & interfered with right of employees to engage in union activity. AMZN challenged 500 votes—so the result was far closer than described. https://t.co/bKKCcciG5S

Read More

Ⓒ 2020 - All Rights Are Reserved

Design and Development by Just Peachy Web Design

Download Our Free Guide

Download our Free Guide

Learn How To Stop Big Box Stores And Fulfillment Warehouses In Your Community

The strategies written here were produced by Sprawl-Busters in 2006 at the request of the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), mainly for citizen groups that were fighting Walmart. But the tips for fighting unwanted development apply to any project—whether its fighting Dollar General, an Amazon warehouse, or a Home Depot.

Big projects, or small, these BATTLEMART TIPS will help you better understand what you are up against, and how to win your battle.