Skip to content
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]
  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, Massachusetts
Search
Close
Sprawl-busters
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
  • Uncategorized

Lawsuit By Blind Reveals No Vision At Target

  • Al Norman
  • October 21, 2007
  • No Comments

For almost two years, the Target corporation has been the legal target of the National Federation for the Blind (NFB) over access to its website by blind people. Last year a California judge allowed a lawsuit by the NFB to proceed. The NFB is insisting that Target make its website accessible to the visually impaired. In court, Target argued that the federal Americans With Disabilities Act applies only to its stores, but in Septembr of 2006, the judge ruled that online stores also are “places of public accommodation.” The NFB says that Target added “Alt-text” to pictures on its site, so that automated readers can describe them to blind shoppers, but a visually impaired person still has to use a mouse or other pointing device to buy stuff, and therefore the site still includes “inaccessible image maps and graphical features that make it difficult for blind users to navigate it.” The suit also says that blind users need to have key-stroking ability rather than a mouse to click on selected items and to complete purchases. More than a year after the original lawsuit was filed, the court has widened the NFB lawsuit by allowing it to proceed as a class action suit. This puts increasing public visibility on Target to find a way to settle the case. The Minnesota-based retailer says that its site is fully accessible for the blind. “Target is committed to serving all of our guests,” the company told the Minneapolis St-Paul Star Tribune. “As our online business has evolved, we have made significant enhancements to improve the experience of our guests who use assistive technologies.” But the NFB says this just isn’t so. The Federation claims that the problem is not hard to solve, because standard screen-reading devices can read Web pages aloud to users. The problem is these screen-readers don’t work on Target’s site. “We frequently get to this point,” the NFB added. “Virtually all companies say they are willing to make changes to fix that. It’s usually inadvertent. We contacted Target and they said they would not fix it. As a last resort, we brought them to court.” The NFB maintains a list of websites that it has certified as accessible to the blind. Wal-Mart’s website, for example, is accessible to the blind, the Federation says.

Target has tried to get this case dismissed, but U.S. District Judge Marilyn Patel denied Target’s motion earlier this month. The judge noted in her ruling that Target has been taking steps since the suit was filed to make its site more accessible to the blind. The giant retailer said the class action designation was just a procedural matter, and “in no way addresses the merit of the claims.” The NFB, which has at least 50,000 members, is not seeking monetary damages, only access and the cost of its legal fees. “This isn’t high-tech stuff,” said a Federation attorney. People with vision problems will become a larger demographic as the population of baby boomers grows old. This lawsuit not only challenges Target’s website, it goes straight to the company’s brand image of being sensitive to community needs. “Target is committed to social, economic and environmental well-being in every community,” the company says on its inaccessible website. “We’re working hard to enhance life through integrity and hard work.” The NFB lawsuit suggests that Target isn’t working hard enough to resolve this problem with the blind. Target is likely to attempt to settle this lawsuit just so shoppers won’t “see” it in the headlines anymore. But until they decide to settle, readers are urged to call Target on their toll-free “online services” line at 1-800-591-3869. Simply tell the company, “Show some vision as a corporation, and settle your lawsuit with the National Federation for the Blind. I hope you can see your way through to make your website accessible to people with visual impairments.”

Like this article?

Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on Linkdin
Share on pinterest
Share on Pinterest
Al Norman

Al Norman

Al Norman first achieved national attention in October of 1993 when he successfully stopped Wal-Mart from locating in his hometown of Greenfield, Massachusetts. Almost 3 decades later they is still not Wal-Mart in Greenfield. Norman has appeared on 60 Minutes, was featured in three films, wrote 3 books about Wal-Mart, and gained widespread media attention from the Wall Street Journal to Fortune magazine. Al has traveled throughout the U.S., Barbados, Puerto Rico, Ireland, and Japan, helping dozens of local coalitions fight off unwanted sprawl development. 60 Minutes called Al “the guru of the anti-Wal-Mart movement.”

Leave a comment

Find Us

  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, MA
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]

Helpful Links

  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
Menu
  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

Recent Posts

CHRISTIAN SMALLS, FIRED AMZN WAREHOUSE WORKER, FILES RACE DISCRIMATION LAWSUIT. …

November 16, 2020

DUE TO THE SURGE IN CORONA CASES, WMT IS LIMITING SHOPPERS TO 5 PER 1,000 SF. A…

November 16, 2020

AMAZON RECENTLY ANNOUNCED FREE 1 HOUR GROCERY PICK UP FOR PRIME MEMBER ORDERS &g…

November 15, 2020

AFTER BEING REJECTED BY THE DEERFIELD, MA PLANNING BOARD, DOLLAR GENERAL APPEALS…

November 15, 2020

WILL TRUMP ALLOW ORACLE & WALMART TO INVEST IN TIK TOK? The deadline to ban …

November 14, 2020

AMAZON ACCUSED OF BREAKING ANTITRUST RULES IN EUROPE. “Data of 3rd-party sellers…

November 14, 2020

WALMART PET CARE NOW SELLING PET INSURANCE. My 3 year old mixed breed cat would …

November 13, 2020

WALMART’S GOING TO THE DOGS. 90 M OF ITS CUSTOMERS HAVE DOGS. You’d be Goofy not…

November 13, 2020

WALMART CASHIERS STILL LOOKING FOR A SEAT. They won a $65 M lawsuit in 2019, but…

November 12, 2020

4 DAYS BEFORE THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION,THE CO-FOUNDER OF HOME DEPOT SAID: “Pres…

November 12, 2020

Recent Tweets

Al Norman 12 hours ago

@saveschodack @TRexSchodack @msainat1 @Chuckjpeter @larryrulison @SteveMcNY @GwenwrightJ The document shown was written by a developer who knows a “retail distribution center” is the same as a warehouse. Schodack officials destroy neighborhoods with this obvious deceit.

Read More
Al Norman 19 hours ago

“HAVING A STABLE, RELIABLE JOB is important...a consistent, predictable schedule that makes it easy for associates to plan for all of the important things going on outside of work.” WMT workers asked for this since 1962. Profits before people. https://t.co/lXO0K8WEMG

Read More
Al Norman 19 hours ago

WAREHOUSE SPRAWL IS EVERYWHERE, “supply chain expansion” to deliver online purchases. Home Depot opens 3 new warehouses in FLA. 332,000 sf size is worse than superstore sprawl. 150 new HD warehouses nationwide. https://t.co/yZIr0i4jr4

Read More

Ⓒ 2020 - All Rights Are Reserved

Design and Development by Just Peachy Web Design

Download Our Free Guide

Download our Free Guide

Learn How To Stop Big Box Stores And Fulfillment Warehouses In Your Community

The strategies written here were produced by Sprawl-Busters in 2006 at the request of the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), mainly for citizen groups that were fighting Walmart. But the tips for fighting unwanted development apply to any project—whether its fighting Dollar General, an Amazon warehouse, or a Home Depot.

Big projects, or small, these BATTLEMART TIPS will help you better understand what you are up against, and how to win your battle.