Skip to content
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]
  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, Massachusetts
Search
Close
Sprawl-busters
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
  • Uncategorized

Rejected Developer Puts Target, Lowe’s Mall On The Ballot

  • Al Norman
  • May 14, 2006
  • No Comments

Just a little over a year ago, Sprawl-Busters reported that voters in San Luis Obispo in a special election voted 51% to reject a big box superstore project, including a Target, Lowe’s and an Old Navy. Voters rebuffed the so-called Dalidio Ranch Marketplace. Here is an update received this week by citizens who are still fighting the Dalidio project: “In April of 2005 the voters of the city of San Luis Obispo California successfully overturned Council approval of a huge mega-mall located in the county on the edge of town. Instead of scaling back the project, the developer/owner Ernie Dalidio, backed by his developer partners, Scott Dabney of Texas and Bill Bird of L.A., are placing an initiative on the SLO County ballot this November that would allow them to build the biggest shopping center in the county (approximately 530,000 square feet) on the city’s border, omitting most of the mitigations which were required by the city. The developers are using an aggressive tactic to force the project upon city residents by going “over their head” to county voters. The initiative, if approved, would undermine local control and set a dangerous precedent. It would mean that county voters would be making decisions about projects near cities and unincorporated communities, leaving local residents and/or elected officials with no say. The county would get all of the sales tax and the city would get all of the environmental impacts and traffic. Alarmed by this development, a county wide group, County Coalition for Local Control (CCLC) is organizing to oppose this initiative. If county voters are gullible enough to shut their eyes and ‘just vote yes,’ a giant shopping mall or nuclear power plant or landfill (whatever the developer wants) could spring up next to any community, anywhere, despite the General Plan, zoning, and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). There is no Environmental Impact Report (EIR) required for a project approved by initiative. The Dalidio Ranch initiative would preempt all zoning ordinances and be exempted from state law requiring analysis of related traffic, air quality, flood hazard, school, water, sewer, fire, police and other community needs and effects. It would be a law unto itself, a law by the developers for the developers. Because there will be no EIR, voters will not have the benefit of all the hard facts regarding the project’s impacts, or whether the whole county or only one city would pay for them. For example, what effect would a project that size in that location have on Highway 101 traffic? When project was on the city ballot, the EIR said that the mall would generate so much traffic, that a new overpass would have to be built to handle it, and even so there would be gridlock on neighboring roads. That is one reason city voters rejected the project. They did not want a project that big in that location and did not want to pay for the overpass. This ‘city voters and impact analysis be damned’ approach to development, if county voters are gullible enough to allow it, would be the fastest way to break our county wide open to rampant, uncontrolled development. The stakes are very high. Defeating this initiative will take an incredible amount of dedication and hard work.”

The County Coalition for Local Control (CCLC) is asking for assistance. If you want to help preserve the county and fight this huge mall, send a postcard with your name, address, phone numbers and email address to CCLC, Post Office Box 121, San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 or call (805) 594-8888. Financial contributions to help the residents of San Luis Obispo can be made out to CCLC, and mailed to the above address. To contact local leaders in CCLC, contact [email protected]

Like this article?

Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on Linkdin
Share on pinterest
Share on Pinterest
Al Norman

Al Norman

Al Norman first achieved national attention in October of 1993 when he successfully stopped Wal-Mart from locating in his hometown of Greenfield, Massachusetts. Almost 3 decades later they is still not Wal-Mart in Greenfield. Norman has appeared on 60 Minutes, was featured in three films, wrote 3 books about Wal-Mart, and gained widespread media attention from the Wall Street Journal to Fortune magazine. Al has traveled throughout the U.S., Barbados, Puerto Rico, Ireland, and Japan, helping dozens of local coalitions fight off unwanted sprawl development. 60 Minutes called Al “the guru of the anti-Wal-Mart movement.”

Leave a comment

Find Us

  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, MA
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]

Helpful Links

  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
Menu
  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

Recent Posts

CHRISTIAN SMALLS, FIRED AMZN WAREHOUSE WORKER, FILES RACE DISCRIMATION LAWSUIT. …

November 16, 2020

DUE TO THE SURGE IN CORONA CASES, WMT IS LIMITING SHOPPERS TO 5 PER 1,000 SF. A…

November 16, 2020

AMAZON RECENTLY ANNOUNCED FREE 1 HOUR GROCERY PICK UP FOR PRIME MEMBER ORDERS &g…

November 15, 2020

AFTER BEING REJECTED BY THE DEERFIELD, MA PLANNING BOARD, DOLLAR GENERAL APPEALS…

November 15, 2020

WILL TRUMP ALLOW ORACLE & WALMART TO INVEST IN TIK TOK? The deadline to ban …

November 14, 2020

AMAZON ACCUSED OF BREAKING ANTITRUST RULES IN EUROPE. “Data of 3rd-party sellers…

November 14, 2020

WALMART PET CARE NOW SELLING PET INSURANCE. My 3 year old mixed breed cat would …

November 13, 2020

WALMART’S GOING TO THE DOGS. 90 M OF ITS CUSTOMERS HAVE DOGS. You’d be Goofy not…

November 13, 2020

WALMART CASHIERS STILL LOOKING FOR A SEAT. They won a $65 M lawsuit in 2019, but…

November 12, 2020

4 DAYS BEFORE THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION,THE CO-FOUNDER OF HOME DEPOT SAID: “Pres…

November 12, 2020

Recent Tweets

Al Norman 13 hours ago

"No nation can succeed that tolerates violence or the threat of violence as a method of political intimidation, coercion, or control. We all know that. Such conduct must be fiercely opposed and firmly prosecuted.” DJ TRUMP, 10/18. https://t.co/s1dClpyRru

Read More
Al Norman 14 hours ago

THREE MONTHS AGO, STOP & SHOP BOASTED THAT IT WOULD BE “AMONG THE FIRST” TO OFFER COVID VACCINES. TODAY, WMT is offering the vaccines to younger people—while many Stop & Shops still have no vaccine. WMT clout gets special deal. https://t.co/pVfhjftU48

Read More
Al Norman 14 hours ago

THREE TIMES AMAZON HAS BEEN ORDERED TO “STOP SALE” OF ILLEGAL HEALTH RISK PESTICIDES. 3 YEARS AGO AMZN PAID $1.2 M TO SETTLE 4,000 EPA CLAIMS. Recent products made false covid-19 claims. https://t.co/Zz8N7akcEC

Read More

Ⓒ 2020 - All Rights Are Reserved

Design and Development by Just Peachy Web Design

Download Our Free Guide

Download our Free Guide

Learn How To Stop Big Box Stores And Fulfillment Warehouses In Your Community

The strategies written here were produced by Sprawl-Busters in 2006 at the request of the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), mainly for citizen groups that were fighting Walmart. But the tips for fighting unwanted development apply to any project—whether its fighting Dollar General, an Amazon warehouse, or a Home Depot.

Big projects, or small, these BATTLEMART TIPS will help you better understand what you are up against, and how to win your battle.