Skip to content
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]
  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, Massachusetts
Search
Close
Sprawl-busters
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
  • Uncategorized

Residents In Victor Finally Victorious Over Wal-Mart

  • Al Norman
  • September 27, 2006
  • No Comments

On April 26, 2003, Sprawl-Busters described the efforts of residents in Victor, New York to stop a proposed “Victor Commerce Park” development, which included a 204,000 sq.ft. Wal-Mart Superstore, three strip plazas, three restaurants, five office buildings, one hotel, one out parcel, for a total of 566,000 sq. ft. There would have been parking for nearly 3,000 cars and only one entrance/exit. It was proposed for a 95 acre parcel surrounded by residential property. The land includes both residential and commercial property. However, according to the town code, when property has two zoning districts, the most conservative zoning rules. The developers, Benderson Development Company, wanted to use a property swap to rezone the parcel in order to make this mini-city possible, instead of going before the zoning board to rezone the property. Last night, the Victor Planning Board Tuesday night ruled that the proposed Wal-Mart superstore was not a good fit for a development site along a busy stretch of Route 96 and near residential
Neighborhoods, according to the Democrat and Chronicle newspaper. By a 6-1 vote, the Planning Board issued a statement of findings that says that no single building in Benderson’s proposed Victor Commerce Park could be more than 100,000 sq. ft. That means Benderson’s Wal-Mart supercenter, which has now grown to 211,699 s.f., is simply too big for the parcel. Benderson could now resubmit a plan that meets the criteria in the Planning Board’s 40-page findings, including a requirement that 51% of the 95 acres must remain open, and that businesses in the proposed development should not be open throughout the night. The developer’s traffic engineers insisted that the traffic problems posed by this enormous development could be addressed, but the Planning Board was not convinced. Town officials said that Benderson could sue the town if they simply rejected the project. “The developer has a legal right to put something on the property. We were in a bind,” the Planning Board Chairman John told the newspaper. Wal-Mart could agree to build a store no larger than 100,000 s.f. “We don’t have an indication from Wal-Mart whether they would want to be part of a proposal that has that limitation,” a Benderson official told the newspaper. The developer now has until October 17th to submit a revised plan conforming to the Planning Board’s findings. The developer said that if Wal-Mart doesn’t downsize for this project, another retailer – with a smaller store – might replace Wal-Mart, although Wal-Mart could try to break down its project into several small stores. Benderson has owned this land for eight years.

This is what happens when a developer refuses to bend to what a community wants. Benderson wouldn’t bend. Victor has been clear about size limits, and land use goals — but the developer has succeeded in tying up its land for eight years, wasting time, money, and running up municipal costs — all for nothing. After all these years, Benderson still has to come back in with a plan that conforms to what the town wants. The threat that Wal-Mart might break its stores into smaller pieces is what the company postured to do in Dunkirk, Maryland, but never did, because of negative publicity. Wal-Mart can try to “game” the system, or, as they did in Tampa, Florida, just build one of their “Urban 99” stores at 99,000 s.f. Either way, the developer had a clear path to take, but muddied the waters so badly by ignoring local wishes, that it has spent a small fortune spinning its wheels, and leaving the residents in Victor victorious over this supercenter project.

Like this article?

Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on Linkdin
Share on pinterest
Share on Pinterest
Al Norman

Al Norman

Al Norman first achieved national attention in October of 1993 when he successfully stopped Wal-Mart from locating in his hometown of Greenfield, Massachusetts. Almost 3 decades later they is still not Wal-Mart in Greenfield. Norman has appeared on 60 Minutes, was featured in three films, wrote 3 books about Wal-Mart, and gained widespread media attention from the Wall Street Journal to Fortune magazine. Al has traveled throughout the U.S., Barbados, Puerto Rico, Ireland, and Japan, helping dozens of local coalitions fight off unwanted sprawl development. 60 Minutes called Al “the guru of the anti-Wal-Mart movement.”

Leave a comment

Find Us

  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, MA
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]

Helpful Links

  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
Menu
  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

Recent Posts

CHRISTIAN SMALLS, FIRED AMZN WAREHOUSE WORKER, FILES RACE DISCRIMATION LAWSUIT. …

November 16, 2020

DUE TO THE SURGE IN CORONA CASES, WMT IS LIMITING SHOPPERS TO 5 PER 1,000 SF. A…

November 16, 2020

AMAZON RECENTLY ANNOUNCED FREE 1 HOUR GROCERY PICK UP FOR PRIME MEMBER ORDERS &g…

November 15, 2020

AFTER BEING REJECTED BY THE DEERFIELD, MA PLANNING BOARD, DOLLAR GENERAL APPEALS…

November 15, 2020

WILL TRUMP ALLOW ORACLE & WALMART TO INVEST IN TIK TOK? The deadline to ban …

November 14, 2020

AMAZON ACCUSED OF BREAKING ANTITRUST RULES IN EUROPE. “Data of 3rd-party sellers…

November 14, 2020

WALMART PET CARE NOW SELLING PET INSURANCE. My 3 year old mixed breed cat would …

November 13, 2020

WALMART’S GOING TO THE DOGS. 90 M OF ITS CUSTOMERS HAVE DOGS. You’d be Goofy not…

November 13, 2020

WALMART CASHIERS STILL LOOKING FOR A SEAT. They won a $65 M lawsuit in 2019, but…

November 12, 2020

4 DAYS BEFORE THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION,THE CO-FOUNDER OF HOME DEPOT SAID: “Pres…

November 12, 2020

Recent Tweets

Al Norman 24 hours ago

SEN KLOBUCHAR FILES COMPETITION & ANTITRUST LAW ENFORCEMENT REFORM ACT, giving Feds resources to strengthen prohibitions on anticompetitive conduct, forbid mergers that lessen competition. “Our economy today faces a massive competition problem.” https://t.co/xCsO3fhDCY

Read More
Al Norman 24 hours ago

FED JUDGE DISMISSES LAWSUIT FROM WHOLE FOODS (AMZN)WORKERS WHO WERE NOT ALLOWED TO WEAR “BLACK LIVES MATTER” FACEMASKS TO WORK. The Civil Rights Act...does not protect one's right to associate with a given social cause, even a race-related one...”

Read More
Al Norman 2 days ago

6,000 AMAZON WORKERS AT A WAREHOUSE IN ALABAMA BEGIN VOTING TODAY ON UNIONIZATION, after NLRB denies AMZN attempt to delay a mail-in vote. https://t.co/XYc7PwhnEl

Read More

Ⓒ 2020 - All Rights Are Reserved

Design and Development by Just Peachy Web Design

Download Our Free Guide

Download our Free Guide

Learn How To Stop Big Box Stores And Fulfillment Warehouses In Your Community

The strategies written here were produced by Sprawl-Busters in 2006 at the request of the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), mainly for citizen groups that were fighting Walmart. But the tips for fighting unwanted development apply to any project—whether its fighting Dollar General, an Amazon warehouse, or a Home Depot.

Big projects, or small, these BATTLEMART TIPS will help you better understand what you are up against, and how to win your battle.