Skip to content
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]
  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, Massachusetts
Search
Close
Sprawl-busters
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
  • Uncategorized

There Is Nothing ‘Fair’ About the Internet Sales Tax

  • Al Norman
  • May 9, 2013
  • No Comments

Just over two years ago I wrote a column on The Huffington Post which charged that giant retailers like Wal-Mart and Target were using mom and pop stores as human shields in their battle against Amazon.com over taxing online sales.

Powerful real estate investment trusts along with big box stores have convinced many in Congress that consumers should pay a sales tax on Internet purchases. It’s being done in the name of the small merchant — the ones that were dispatched to an early grave by the likes of Wal-Mart.

The group spearheading the lobbying for the internet sales tax calls itself the “Alliance for Main Street Fairness.” They are not located on Main Street, and what they want is not fair. These corporations are the ones who picked dry the bones of Main Street businesses for the past 50 years. One Wal-Mart official complained to the Wall Street Journal, “The rules today don’t allow brick-and-mortar retailers to compete evenly with online retailers, and that needs to be addressed.” Wal-Mart crying about fair competition?

This Alliance recently staged a “fly-in” to Washington, D.C. “to speak to their Members of Congress about the importance of passing something called “e-fairness.” It was worth every drop of jet fuel, as the Senate caved in and passed the “Marketplace Fairness Act.”

Ironically, the Alliance is being challenged by some conservatives in the U.S. House who see an internet sales tax as a new tax. In response, the Barons of Main Street have paraded out figurehead conservatives like Congressman Paul Ryan (R-WI) who is quoted as saying of the internet sales tax: “It’s only fair that the local brick-and-mortar retailer be treated the same as the big-box online sales company out of state.”

I have never seen a “big box online sales company” because there is no such thing. Companies like Amazon do have huge warehouses — the same kind that Wal-Mart has — but Amazon and eBay don’t have big box stores sprawling along our highways, attracting tens of thousands of cars every day — crime magnets and exhaust corridors.

Here is why a sales tax on internet sales is not fair:

1. The sales tax is regressive, and imposing it on internet sales hurts low income people the most, rich people the least.
2. Bricks and mort
ar big boxes impose an enormous cost on taxpayers in the form of public safety expenses — like added police and fire protection — environmental damage (google: “heat islands”), infrastructure costs (water, sewage, roads), etc.

3. Raising the bottom line cost of an internet sale is a perverse incentive, because as a society, we pay a lower transaction cost when people stay off the road and avoid another gas junket to the mall.

We should give virtual retailers an “advantage” because they do not tax our public support costs like the big box stores do. We should be creating incentives for consumers to shop local and shop online for this very reason.

The Alliance claims it represents “florists and independent bookstores… electronics stores and art galleries.” I am not moved by the argument that local bookstores or florists are being killed by online retailers. The truth is, big box stores got to that graveside first. And nobody goes to Wal-Mart to buy art — not even the Elvis on Velvet crowd.

If you want to help smaller merchants, give them an income tax break or more generous deductions on their taxes. Lower their cost of doing business. Encourage shoppers to visit smaller stores by lowering the sales tax at establishments with less than $1 million in annual sales, and make up the lost revenues by raising the sales tax at retailers with sales greater than $10 million. Make the sales tax more progressive at the point of sale. That would help level the field for a small clothing store that can’t buy 1 million shirts from Bangladesh like Wal-Mart can.

We need to drop the fig leaf of ‘fairness’ and realize that taxation in this country has never been about fairness. It’s all about corporate power and money. Our tax system favors the rich — so Congress responds by raising the one tax which hurts the poor the most.

“We are not advocating for a new tax,” the Alliance says. “Instead, we are advocating for states to be able to enforce their current sales tax laws on every business selling in their state.” Even if you can’t find an eBay store or an Amazon store in your state, the Alliance wants you to pay taxes just like you do at the big box store that steals local jobs and runs up a huge police and fire tab in your hometown budget every year.

Let’s reward people who shop online. Let’s create incentives for consumers to shop local. And let’s make the big boxes see what it’s like to be disadvantaged.

Ask yourself this: If Wal-Mart has become the champion of Fairness, then who is watching over the gates of Hell?

Readers are urged to cut and paste this article into an email to your two U.S. Senators. Tell them: “Read this article and stop following the lead of Wal-Mart. Stop the tax on internet sales — and instead create some incentives for shoppers who go to local merchants or the internet, and impose higher costs on people who shop at sprawling big box stores.”

Just over two years ago I wrote a column on the Huffington Post which charged that giant retailers like Wal-Mart and Target were using mom and pop stores as human shields in their battle against Amazon.com over taxing online sales.

Like this article?

Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on Linkdin
Share on pinterest
Share on Pinterest
Al Norman

Al Norman

Al Norman first achieved national attention in October of 1993 when he successfully stopped Wal-Mart from locating in his hometown of Greenfield, Massachusetts. Almost 3 decades later they is still not Wal-Mart in Greenfield. Norman has appeared on 60 Minutes, was featured in three films, wrote 3 books about Wal-Mart, and gained widespread media attention from the Wall Street Journal to Fortune magazine. Al has traveled throughout the U.S., Barbados, Puerto Rico, Ireland, and Japan, helping dozens of local coalitions fight off unwanted sprawl development. 60 Minutes called Al “the guru of the anti-Wal-Mart movement.”

Leave a comment

Find Us

  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, MA
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]

Helpful Links

  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
Menu
  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

Recent Posts

CHRISTIAN SMALLS, FIRED AMZN WAREHOUSE WORKER, FILES RACE DISCRIMATION LAWSUIT. …

November 16, 2020

DUE TO THE SURGE IN CORONA CASES, WMT IS LIMITING SHOPPERS TO 5 PER 1,000 SF. A…

November 16, 2020

AMAZON RECENTLY ANNOUNCED FREE 1 HOUR GROCERY PICK UP FOR PRIME MEMBER ORDERS &g…

November 15, 2020

AFTER BEING REJECTED BY THE DEERFIELD, MA PLANNING BOARD, DOLLAR GENERAL APPEALS…

November 15, 2020

WILL TRUMP ALLOW ORACLE & WALMART TO INVEST IN TIK TOK? The deadline to ban …

November 14, 2020

AMAZON ACCUSED OF BREAKING ANTITRUST RULES IN EUROPE. “Data of 3rd-party sellers…

November 14, 2020

WALMART PET CARE NOW SELLING PET INSURANCE. My 3 year old mixed breed cat would …

November 13, 2020

WALMART’S GOING TO THE DOGS. 90 M OF ITS CUSTOMERS HAVE DOGS. You’d be Goofy not…

November 13, 2020

WALMART CASHIERS STILL LOOKING FOR A SEAT. They won a $65 M lawsuit in 2019, but…

November 12, 2020

4 DAYS BEFORE THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION,THE CO-FOUNDER OF HOME DEPOT SAID: “Pres…

November 12, 2020

Recent Tweets

Al Norman 21 hours ago

UNION FILES NLRB COMPLAINT that AMZN interfered with right of warehouse employees to a “free & fair election,” & interfered with right of employees to engage in union activity. AMZN challenged 500 votes—so the result was far closer than described. https://t.co/bKKCcciG5S

Read More
Al Norman 21 hours ago

AFTER AMAZON’S VICTORY OVER THE UNION, “if policymakers do not reform our nation’s labor law system, then they are effectively denying workers a meaningful right to a union & collective bargaining.’' AMZN actually brags about a wage of $15.30hr. https://t.co/qbsjyNB1Ri

Read More
Al Norman 2 days ago

COURT MAKES WMT PAY $115 M TO LAB which “uses sensors to track perishable food shipments...through the supply chain to the store shelves,” measuring freshness. Lab sued WMT for stealing its technology to create its own version. https://t.co/UW3fIt2qDu

Read More

Ⓒ 2020 - All Rights Are Reserved

Design and Development by Just Peachy Web Design

Download Our Free Guide

Download our Free Guide

Learn How To Stop Big Box Stores And Fulfillment Warehouses In Your Community

The strategies written here were produced by Sprawl-Busters in 2006 at the request of the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), mainly for citizen groups that were fighting Walmart. But the tips for fighting unwanted development apply to any project—whether its fighting Dollar General, an Amazon warehouse, or a Home Depot.

Big projects, or small, these BATTLEMART TIPS will help you better understand what you are up against, and how to win your battle.