Skip to content
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]
  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, Massachusetts
Search
Close
Sprawl-busters
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
  • Uncategorized

Wal-Mart Blames Economics For Project Cancellation

  • Al Norman
  • February 27, 2008
  • No Comments

Wal-Mart says business is blossoming as the nation slides into a recession, but the company keeps pruning off supercenter projects like dead limbs. The economic development director in Oakley, California is disappointed and obviously frustrated this week. She joins a long line of city and town officials who have been abandoned by Wal-Mart, as the giant retailer continues to drop superstore plans. Sprawl-Busters last updated the Oakley story on December 10, 2007. Wal-Mart had submitted in the summer of 2007 plans to build a 220,012 s.f. supercenter in Oakley. The superstore was slated for 76 acres of land near Highway 160. Wal-Mart called its project “River Oaks Crossing.” It has no oaks in it, but Wal-Mart said the new store would “generate about 450 local jobs.” Oakley was created as a city in 1999, so it is one of the youngest cities in America. Its population is around 26,000. The city, which is only an hour’s drive from San Francisco, boasts of its “bountiful agricultural” heritage, and describes the community as “a fishing and boating paradise.” Part of its tourist pitch outlines the “gently rolling hills, crisscrossed by country lanes and patch-worked with vineyards and orchards.” They don’t mention Wal-Mart in that description. In fact, the city’s leadership says its “working to maintain Oakley’s small town character while strongly encouraging the development of new industries to employ the growing local workforce.” But Oakley already has 8 Wal-Marts within 25 miles, including the Antioch store on Lone Tree Way less than 4 miles from this site. The city has already enacted an ordinance that bans construction of supercenters. But Oakley Mayor Kevin Romick appeared to be oblivious to any concerns about Wal-Mart. “The proposed project will generate much-needed sales tax revenue for Oakley to fund police and fire services,” the Mayor said at the time, “and to maintain and upgrade streets, parks and other infrastructure. The venture will also stimulate Oakley’s commercial development, create new jobs in the community, and provide additional shopping opportunities for our residents.” An opposition group, Save Oakley Now was formed, and collected 1,000 signatures from residents against the Wal-Mart. A Wal-Mart “senior public affairs manager” told the Contra Costa Times, “Unfortunately, there are some divisive special interests that are seeking personal benefit at the expense of Oakley residents. Wal-Mart is focused on moving forward and becoming a strong community partner that has a positive impact throughout Oakley.” But an economic impact study painted a less rosy picture. According to the study, Oakley’s CentroMart and Raley’s grocery store could both close if Wal-Mart opens. The Kmart store in nearby Antioch could also close. Officials in Oakley issued a joint press release with Wal-Mart, in which they said “City officials are committed to making this location a signature development for Oakley and the region, as well as an economic engine for its residents. This project will be located on property zoned for commercial uses and will provide community benefits that go far beyond its commercial footprint.” But this week, Wal-Mart’s footprint disappeared. Blaming “unforeseen economic factors” as the biggest reason, Wal-Mart announced it is shutting down its plans for the supercenter at River Oaks Crossing. A spokesman for Wal-Mart said, “…Unfortunately, unforeseen economic factors have rendered this project economically infeasible at this time.” No details on the “factors” were given. As always, Wal-Mart left the back door open, saying they hoped to “eventually bring a store to Oakley.”

The city is now scrambling around trying to salvage what they can of the River Oaks Crossing. According to the East Bay Business Times, Wal-Mart was purchasing the entire 76 acres parcel for the project, with its superstore taking up 20 of those acres. “The city is disappointed with the change of plans, as this project would be a strong anchor for River Oaks Crossing and provide significant amount of sales and property taxes for Oakley,” the city’s economic development director told the media. “…This was a major strike against the project since Wal-Mart would have to initially front the cost of the entire site which tipped the scales to not be in the project’s favor.” City officials told the media that Oakley was one of 140 supercenter projects being scratched by Wal-Mart. This cancellation gives Mayor Romick a new chance to influence the future character of this small community. Give Mayor Romick your views on Wal-Mart. Drop him an email at [email protected] or send one to the City Council at: [email protected] Tell Mayor Romick: “Now that Wal-Mart has left Oakley at the altar, it’s a great time to amend your zoning code to limit the size of retail stores to 65,000 s.f. The River Oaks Crossing was way out of scale with the rest of Oakley. If you are trying to promote your city for its ‘gently rolling hills, crisscrossed by country lanes and patch-worked with vineyards and orchards,’ then Wal-Mart is completely incongruent. Oakley can have a vital retail economy — but you can do it without huge supercenters. When you open one superstore, you close down two grocery stores. That’s not economic development, that’s just retail musical chairs. Take advantage of what Wal-Mart has left you: a chance to grow your small business sector, and to amend your zoning to make the retail economy reflect the gently rolling hills that you cherish.”

Like this article?

Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on Linkdin
Share on pinterest
Share on Pinterest
Al Norman

Al Norman

Al Norman first achieved national attention in October of 1993 when he successfully stopped Wal-Mart from locating in his hometown of Greenfield, Massachusetts. Almost 3 decades later they is still not Wal-Mart in Greenfield. Norman has appeared on 60 Minutes, was featured in three films, wrote 3 books about Wal-Mart, and gained widespread media attention from the Wall Street Journal to Fortune magazine. Al has traveled throughout the U.S., Barbados, Puerto Rico, Ireland, and Japan, helping dozens of local coalitions fight off unwanted sprawl development. 60 Minutes called Al “the guru of the anti-Wal-Mart movement.”

Leave a comment

Find Us

  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, MA
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]

Helpful Links

  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
Menu
  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

Recent Posts

CHRISTIAN SMALLS, FIRED AMZN WAREHOUSE WORKER, FILES RACE DISCRIMATION LAWSUIT. …

November 16, 2020

DUE TO THE SURGE IN CORONA CASES, WMT IS LIMITING SHOPPERS TO 5 PER 1,000 SF. A…

November 16, 2020

AMAZON RECENTLY ANNOUNCED FREE 1 HOUR GROCERY PICK UP FOR PRIME MEMBER ORDERS &g…

November 15, 2020

AFTER BEING REJECTED BY THE DEERFIELD, MA PLANNING BOARD, DOLLAR GENERAL APPEALS…

November 15, 2020

WILL TRUMP ALLOW ORACLE & WALMART TO INVEST IN TIK TOK? The deadline to ban …

November 14, 2020

AMAZON ACCUSED OF BREAKING ANTITRUST RULES IN EUROPE. “Data of 3rd-party sellers…

November 14, 2020

WALMART PET CARE NOW SELLING PET INSURANCE. My 3 year old mixed breed cat would …

November 13, 2020

WALMART’S GOING TO THE DOGS. 90 M OF ITS CUSTOMERS HAVE DOGS. You’d be Goofy not…

November 13, 2020

WALMART CASHIERS STILL LOOKING FOR A SEAT. They won a $65 M lawsuit in 2019, but…

November 12, 2020

4 DAYS BEFORE THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION,THE CO-FOUNDER OF HOME DEPOT SAID: “Pres…

November 12, 2020

Recent Tweets

Al Norman 20 hours ago

UNION FILES NLRB COMPLAINT that AMZN interfered with right of warehouse employees to a “free & fair election,” & interfered with right of employees to engage in union activity. AMZN challenged 500 votes—so the result was far closer than described. https://t.co/bKKCcciG5S

Read More
Al Norman 20 hours ago

AFTER AMAZON’S VICTORY OVER THE UNION, “if policymakers do not reform our nation’s labor law system, then they are effectively denying workers a meaningful right to a union & collective bargaining.’' AMZN actually brags about a wage of $15.30hr. https://t.co/qbsjyNB1Ri

Read More
Al Norman 2 days ago

COURT MAKES WMT PAY $115 M TO LAB which “uses sensors to track perishable food shipments...through the supply chain to the store shelves,” measuring freshness. Lab sued WMT for stealing its technology to create its own version. https://t.co/UW3fIt2qDu

Read More

Ⓒ 2020 - All Rights Are Reserved

Design and Development by Just Peachy Web Design

Download Our Free Guide

Download our Free Guide

Learn How To Stop Big Box Stores And Fulfillment Warehouses In Your Community

The strategies written here were produced by Sprawl-Busters in 2006 at the request of the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), mainly for citizen groups that were fighting Walmart. But the tips for fighting unwanted development apply to any project—whether its fighting Dollar General, an Amazon warehouse, or a Home Depot.

Big projects, or small, these BATTLEMART TIPS will help you better understand what you are up against, and how to win your battle.