Skip to content
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]
  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, Massachusetts
Search
Close
Sprawl-busters
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
  • Uncategorized

Wal-Mart Gets Another Class Action Case

  • Al Norman
  • June 14, 2007
  • No Comments

Wal-Mart went to the head of the class again this week, when a Western District Appeals Court in Missouri affirmed a lower court ruling that Wal-Mart workers in the Show Me State can bring a class action lawsuit against the retailer for forcing workers to go without meal and rest breaks. These so-called “off the clock” lawsuits charge that Wal-Mart required its employees to clock out — but then stay on the job and work without pay, sometimes cleaning up their department for hours. Wal-Mart is slogging through such cases in as many as 30 states. The company routinely challenges class action cases, because it is far less expensive for Wal-Mart to defend itself against a bunch of unrelated smaller cases — many of which take years to pursue and are dropped by the plaintiffs — than to deal one large class of thousands of plaintiffs. The company routinely argues that it has no company-wide policy regarding off the clock work, and that each store is individually managed, and thus class actions combining many stores under one case are not appropriate. But Wal-Mart has lost major “off the clock” class actions in California, Colorado, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey. The company tells its stockholders, “(We) cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of loss from these lawsuits.” In the Missouri case, the state appeals court rejected Wal-Mart efforts to overturn the class action determination. Wal-Mart claims that class action certification has been denied by the courts in 14 cases. They claim that class action status has been granted in whole or part in 8 cases. Missouri would be the 9th. class action status certified. A Wal-Mart spokesman told the Associated Press the company disappointed by the Missouri verdict. This case began in 2002 when 5 Wal-Mart workers in Missouri charged that the company compelled them to work without pay after they had clocking out. Three years later, the Jefferson County Circuit Court ruled in favor of class-action status, and determined that the affected class of workers encompassed as many as 200,000 current and former Missouri workers employed by Wal-Mart. The lawyer for the employees said he hopes the case will come to trial about a year from now.

The retailer had better news in New York, where the state supreme court this week rejected class action status for a similar off the clock case. The New York Supreme Court said the class of roughly 200,000 employees who worked at Wal-Mart over the past decade was overly broad. This will force the New York workers who are suing the company to pursue their cases alone — which will prove costlier, and not attract the same caliber of legal defense that a major stakes class action would attract. Rather than go to court in a class action suit, Wal-Mart will first challenge the class action status, and failing that, settle with the class rather than go through months of an ugly court case. In Colorado, Wal-Mart paid $50 million to settle the class action suit in that state. In California and Pennsylvania, Wal-Mart lost very expensive decisions in court, and is now appealing both verdicts. The judgments in just these two cases came to more than $250 million. In the Pennsylvania case, Wal-Mart was ordered to pay $78 million — but the workers are now seeking to add at least $62 million to that victory, and Wal-Mart is challenging the verdict. In the Missouri decision, the case has now been sent back to the Jefferson County Circuit Court to try as class action litigation. Wal-Mart’s unknown “range of loss” just continues to climb.

Like this article?

Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on Linkdin
Share on pinterest
Share on Pinterest
Al Norman

Al Norman

Al Norman first achieved national attention in October of 1993 when he successfully stopped Wal-Mart from locating in his hometown of Greenfield, Massachusetts. Almost 3 decades later they is still not Wal-Mart in Greenfield. Norman has appeared on 60 Minutes, was featured in three films, wrote 3 books about Wal-Mart, and gained widespread media attention from the Wall Street Journal to Fortune magazine. Al has traveled throughout the U.S., Barbados, Puerto Rico, Ireland, and Japan, helping dozens of local coalitions fight off unwanted sprawl development. 60 Minutes called Al “the guru of the anti-Wal-Mart movement.”

Leave a comment

Find Us

  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, MA
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]

Helpful Links

  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
Menu
  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

Recent Posts

CHRISTIAN SMALLS, FIRED AMZN WAREHOUSE WORKER, FILES RACE DISCRIMATION LAWSUIT. …

November 16, 2020

DUE TO THE SURGE IN CORONA CASES, WMT IS LIMITING SHOPPERS TO 5 PER 1,000 SF. A…

November 16, 2020

AMAZON RECENTLY ANNOUNCED FREE 1 HOUR GROCERY PICK UP FOR PRIME MEMBER ORDERS &g…

November 15, 2020

AFTER BEING REJECTED BY THE DEERFIELD, MA PLANNING BOARD, DOLLAR GENERAL APPEALS…

November 15, 2020

WILL TRUMP ALLOW ORACLE & WALMART TO INVEST IN TIK TOK? The deadline to ban …

November 14, 2020

AMAZON ACCUSED OF BREAKING ANTITRUST RULES IN EUROPE. “Data of 3rd-party sellers…

November 14, 2020

WALMART PET CARE NOW SELLING PET INSURANCE. My 3 year old mixed breed cat would …

November 13, 2020

WALMART’S GOING TO THE DOGS. 90 M OF ITS CUSTOMERS HAVE DOGS. You’d be Goofy not…

November 13, 2020

WALMART CASHIERS STILL LOOKING FOR A SEAT. They won a $65 M lawsuit in 2019, but…

November 12, 2020

4 DAYS BEFORE THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION,THE CO-FOUNDER OF HOME DEPOT SAID: “Pres…

November 12, 2020

Recent Tweets

Al Norman 13 hours ago

“40 Million s.f. of additional warehouse space will be needed in the next 5 years” in Canada. “Retailers are rushing to build logistics hubs to fulfill orders...Every retailer knows they have to have a digital presence to survive.” We need to cap the size of this sprawl now! https://t.co/d4BTb4p1TI

Read More
Al Norman 13 hours ago

“NORMAN EXPLAINED that the big boxes could shift to opening warehouses...designed to ship out online orders, so ‘any zoning code should be changed to include the definition of warehouses.’” Lots of trucks, no shoppers, $15/hr jobs.(paywall) https://t.co/3etw7HKIyA

Read More
Al Norman 2 days ago

WMT has a “mediocre track record” in its international division..For years it downplayed e-commerce, allowing AMZN to take a commanding position... the biggest driving force for WMT to focus more & more...is its critical battle with Amazon.” https://t.co/Gc36hsH2RW

Read More

Ⓒ 2020 - All Rights Are Reserved

Design and Development by Just Peachy Web Design

Download Our Free Guide

Download our Free Guide

Learn How To Stop Big Box Stores And Fulfillment Warehouses In Your Community

The strategies written here were produced by Sprawl-Busters in 2006 at the request of the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), mainly for citizen groups that were fighting Walmart. But the tips for fighting unwanted development apply to any project—whether its fighting Dollar General, an Amazon warehouse, or a Home Depot.

Big projects, or small, these BATTLEMART TIPS will help you better understand what you are up against, and how to win your battle.