Skip to content
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]
  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, Massachusetts
Search
Close
Sprawl-busters
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
  • Uncategorized

Wal-Mart Loses 2nd. Court Case

  • Al Norman
  • October 27, 2007
  • No Comments

A Wal-Mart front group in Tucson, Arizona has two strikes against it, but wants to take one final cut at the pitch. The “Consumers for Retail Choice”, which serves as a voice for Wal-Mart corporate lyrics, organized a petition drive last year to challenge a new Tucson city ordinance that restricts the hours of operation, noise and interior non-taxable contents of stores over 100,000 s.f. (see 11/12/99 and 2/5/00 newsflashes below). The ordinance vexes Wal-Mart because it limits the store space that can be allotted for food sales, and could prove disasterous to the superstore movement if imitated in other cities. So Wal-Mart is drawing a line in the deli section to stop this kind of ordinance cold. A similar statewide measure was vetoed by California Governor Grey Davis last year. So Wal-Mart spent $30,000 to gather signatures for a referendum on the Tucson law, gathered 14,770 signatures, only to have them challenged by the city bedause they were on the wrong forms. Last January a Superior Court judge ruled that the city had to go by state rules — but also that Wal-Mart did not collect enough signatures because state law stipulated that signatures had to equal a fixed percentage of the votes cast, not the ballots cast. Since each voter cast several votes for different offices, Wal-Mart was short on the signature count. Wal-Mart took the decision one step higher to the Arizona Court of Appeals, which ruled at the end of May that Tucson has the right to have more restrictive referendum requirements as long as they do not conflict with state law, and that Tucson could make “minor tailoring of referendum procedures to meet their own particular needs”. Although Wal-Mart has dropped its plans for a 200,000 s.f. superstore in the hotly contested El Con mall project, the company has made it clear it has “other interests in Tucson” and wants to kill the ordinance so it doesn’t appear in any other Arizona town. But Home Depot is still trying to build a store in the El Con mall, and local residents are just as determined as ever to stop them. For now, the Tucson ordinance stands, and Wal-Mart’s efforts to buy ‘democracy” in Arizona has failed.

According to the Arizona Daily Star, Wal-Mart has vowed to appeal the two lower court decisions to the Arizona Supreme Court. So the “Consumers for Retail Choice” remains the plaintiff, even though it’s really Wal-Mart that is the plaintiff. But one more strike, and the Consumers for Eetail Choice Sponsored by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc, is out of the game. When you shop at Wal-Mart, you are helping to underwrite the legal expenses of groups like the “Citizens for Retail Choice.” It IS your choice, and you can shop somewhere else and invest in your community instead.

Like this article?

Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on Linkdin
Share on pinterest
Share on Pinterest
Al Norman

Al Norman

Al Norman first achieved national attention in October of 1993 when he successfully stopped Wal-Mart from locating in his hometown of Greenfield, Massachusetts. Almost 3 decades later they is still not Wal-Mart in Greenfield. Norman has appeared on 60 Minutes, was featured in three films, wrote 3 books about Wal-Mart, and gained widespread media attention from the Wall Street Journal to Fortune magazine. Al has traveled throughout the U.S., Barbados, Puerto Rico, Ireland, and Japan, helping dozens of local coalitions fight off unwanted sprawl development. 60 Minutes called Al “the guru of the anti-Wal-Mart movement.”

Leave a comment

Find Us

  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, MA
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]

Helpful Links

  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
Menu
  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

Recent Posts

CHRISTIAN SMALLS, FIRED AMZN WAREHOUSE WORKER, FILES RACE DISCRIMATION LAWSUIT. …

November 16, 2020

DUE TO THE SURGE IN CORONA CASES, WMT IS LIMITING SHOPPERS TO 5 PER 1,000 SF. A…

November 16, 2020

AMAZON RECENTLY ANNOUNCED FREE 1 HOUR GROCERY PICK UP FOR PRIME MEMBER ORDERS &g…

November 15, 2020

AFTER BEING REJECTED BY THE DEERFIELD, MA PLANNING BOARD, DOLLAR GENERAL APPEALS…

November 15, 2020

WILL TRUMP ALLOW ORACLE & WALMART TO INVEST IN TIK TOK? The deadline to ban …

November 14, 2020

AMAZON ACCUSED OF BREAKING ANTITRUST RULES IN EUROPE. “Data of 3rd-party sellers…

November 14, 2020

WALMART PET CARE NOW SELLING PET INSURANCE. My 3 year old mixed breed cat would …

November 13, 2020

WALMART’S GOING TO THE DOGS. 90 M OF ITS CUSTOMERS HAVE DOGS. You’d be Goofy not…

November 13, 2020

WALMART CASHIERS STILL LOOKING FOR A SEAT. They won a $65 M lawsuit in 2019, but…

November 12, 2020

4 DAYS BEFORE THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION,THE CO-FOUNDER OF HOME DEPOT SAID: “Pres…

November 12, 2020

Recent Tweets

Al Norman 20 hours ago

WALMART ADMITS IT “MADE A MISTAKE” IN FL. VACCINE ROLLOUT. Several thousand people under age 65 with underlying conditions were given appointments. https://t.co/VPF3CBeezv

Read More
Al Norman 20 hours ago

WITH TRUMP GONE, TIK TOK DOESN’T HAVE TO DO A DEAL WITH WALMART. “The deal was mainly designed to entertain demands from the Trump administration. But Trump is gone, & the raison d’être of the deal is gone with him.” Politics + Biz = Bad BIz. https://t.co/U3chrquEuN

Read More
Al Norman 2 days ago

"No nation can succeed that tolerates violence or the threat of violence as a method of political intimidation, coercion, or control. We all know that. Such conduct must be fiercely opposed and firmly prosecuted.” DJ TRUMP, 10/18. https://t.co/s1dClpyRru

Read More

Ⓒ 2020 - All Rights Are Reserved

Design and Development by Just Peachy Web Design

Download Our Free Guide

Download our Free Guide

Learn How To Stop Big Box Stores And Fulfillment Warehouses In Your Community

The strategies written here were produced by Sprawl-Busters in 2006 at the request of the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), mainly for citizen groups that were fighting Walmart. But the tips for fighting unwanted development apply to any project—whether its fighting Dollar General, an Amazon warehouse, or a Home Depot.

Big projects, or small, these BATTLEMART TIPS will help you better understand what you are up against, and how to win your battle.