Skip to content
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]
  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, Massachusetts
Search
Close
Sprawl-busters
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
  • Uncategorized

Wal-Mart Settles ‘Dead Peasants’ Life Insurance Lawsuit

  • Al Norman
  • December 5, 2006
  • No Comments

On January 10, 2004, Sprawl-Busters reported that a court ruled that Wal-Mart had unlawfully taken survivor’s benefits away from families of deceased Wal-Mart employees. These life insurance policies are called ‘dead peasant’ policies — policies that a company takes out on its employees, naming the company — not the family’s survivors — as the beneficiary. A 5th. U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans, Louisiana ruled in support of a lower court ruling against Wal-Mart in tjat lawsuit originally filed in Houston, Texas. The Appeals Court agreed that the company “unlawfully took funds, that, under Texas law, rightfully belonged” to the relatives of the dead Wal-Mart workers. Now, roughly two years later, Wal-Mart has agreed to settle a $5.1 million class-action lawsuit, this time brought by the estates of 73 former employees in Oklahoma. According to the Associated Press, a federal judge in Tulsa gave final approval yesterday to the settlement, which calls for about a third of the money to go to the plaintiffs’ lawyers, and each plaintiffs gets between $35,000 to $50,000. These families had sued to get back the life insurance benefits they said Wal-Mart illegally took when their relatives who worked for the retailer died. “It was a fair result for these Oklahoma families,” said Michael D. Myers of Houston, one of the plaintiffs’ lawyers. The lawsuit charged that Wal-Mart had no “insurable interest in the lives of its rank-and-file employees.” Myers told the AP that “several million Americans are covered by these policies. Most were probably never told about the insurance on their lives, meaning that their families may not know that a claim may exist for policy benefits.” Before settling, Wal-Mart had tried to get the courts to dismiss the lawsuit. Once that failed, Wal-Mart decided to reach an agreement. Wal-Mart argued that it costs them millions to recruit, screen, and train its workers, so it should receive some compensation for that loss in investment when they die. “Corporate-owned life insurance (COLI) policies were products offered by life insurance companies, they were common and well-intentioned but are no longer available at Wal-Mart,” a spokesman for the retailer said. “With regard to the settlement, it’s the best possible resolution under the circumstances.”

In my book, “The Case Against Wal-Mart,” I wrote about these “dead peasant” policies, and the fact that Wal-Mart families had to take the company to court, and wait years to get the money that rightfully should have come to the survivors. The idea of Wal-Mart naming itself as beneficiary of a life insurance policy that many families knew nothing about, may strike most Americans as unethical and unconscionable. But even worse, when the families found out about the policies, Wal-Mart fought them all the way, and forced them to give up one-third of their benefits to lawyers. Wal-Mart’s slogan is: “Our people make the difference.” In this case, the difference came to $5.1 million. For the earlier story on the Texas case, search Newsflash by “dead peasant.”

Like this article?

Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on Linkdin
Share on pinterest
Share on Pinterest
Al Norman

Al Norman

Al Norman first achieved national attention in October of 1993 when he successfully stopped Wal-Mart from locating in his hometown of Greenfield, Massachusetts. Almost 3 decades later they is still not Wal-Mart in Greenfield. Norman has appeared on 60 Minutes, was featured in three films, wrote 3 books about Wal-Mart, and gained widespread media attention from the Wall Street Journal to Fortune magazine. Al has traveled throughout the U.S., Barbados, Puerto Rico, Ireland, and Japan, helping dozens of local coalitions fight off unwanted sprawl development. 60 Minutes called Al “the guru of the anti-Wal-Mart movement.”

Leave a comment

Find Us

  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, MA
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]

Helpful Links

  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
Menu
  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

Recent Posts

CHRISTIAN SMALLS, FIRED AMZN WAREHOUSE WORKER, FILES RACE DISCRIMATION LAWSUIT. …

November 16, 2020

DUE TO THE SURGE IN CORONA CASES, WMT IS LIMITING SHOPPERS TO 5 PER 1,000 SF. A…

November 16, 2020

AMAZON RECENTLY ANNOUNCED FREE 1 HOUR GROCERY PICK UP FOR PRIME MEMBER ORDERS &g…

November 15, 2020

AFTER BEING REJECTED BY THE DEERFIELD, MA PLANNING BOARD, DOLLAR GENERAL APPEALS…

November 15, 2020

WILL TRUMP ALLOW ORACLE & WALMART TO INVEST IN TIK TOK? The deadline to ban …

November 14, 2020

AMAZON ACCUSED OF BREAKING ANTITRUST RULES IN EUROPE. “Data of 3rd-party sellers…

November 14, 2020

WALMART PET CARE NOW SELLING PET INSURANCE. My 3 year old mixed breed cat would …

November 13, 2020

WALMART’S GOING TO THE DOGS. 90 M OF ITS CUSTOMERS HAVE DOGS. You’d be Goofy not…

November 13, 2020

WALMART CASHIERS STILL LOOKING FOR A SEAT. They won a $65 M lawsuit in 2019, but…

November 12, 2020

4 DAYS BEFORE THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION,THE CO-FOUNDER OF HOME DEPOT SAID: “Pres…

November 12, 2020

Recent Tweets

Al Norman 5 hours ago

IN 2020, WMT had $520 B in sales, & made $15.2B in profit. On $386 B in sales, AMZN made $21 B in profit. WMT sells 1/3rd more, but AMZN makes nearly 2x the % of profits. This is why WMT wants to diversify beyond low-margin groceries. https://t.co/ifYAth70LF

Read More
Al Norman 5 hours ago

SUSPECTED shoplifter shot inside a San Antonio Walmart. “I’m not going to come back here again. You never know when your last day is, just stay home, it’s better. If you need it that bad, get it delivered.” https://t.co/i7eFNhyyWL

Read More
Al Norman 1 day ago

IN TWO county elections, “controlled growth” voters on Maryland’s shore tossed out a “slew”of pro-sprawl county commissioners. Anti-big box sentiment reaches political “fervor.” https://t.co/FpCFl6T090

Read More

Ⓒ 2020 - All Rights Are Reserved

Design and Development by Just Peachy Web Design

Download Our Free Guide

Download our Free Guide

Learn How To Stop Big Box Stores And Fulfillment Warehouses In Your Community

The strategies written here were produced by Sprawl-Busters in 2006 at the request of the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), mainly for citizen groups that were fighting Walmart. But the tips for fighting unwanted development apply to any project—whether its fighting Dollar General, an Amazon warehouse, or a Home Depot.

Big projects, or small, these BATTLEMART TIPS will help you better understand what you are up against, and how to win your battle.