Skip to content
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]
  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, Massachusetts
Search
Close
Sprawl-busters
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
  • Uncategorized

Workers Want Wal-Mart Supervised in Meals & Rest Break Violations

  • Al Norman
  • July 6, 2006
  • No Comments

Wal-Mart didn’t give its California workers a break, so now the workers aren’t giving Wal-Mart a break. In December, 2005, an Oakland, California jury awarded $172 million to 116,000 Wal-Mart workers who were systematically denied lunch breaks between 1998 and 2001. But now those same workers charge that the company has not changed its way, and they want the court to intervene to require Wal-Mart to be monitored for compliance with wage laws. California is one of a handful of states in the nation that fines employers for violation of meal-break rules. The 3 year old law entitles employees who work more than five hours without a meal break to sue for one hour of pay for each missed meal going back as much as three years. The Wal-Mart case, Savaglio v. Wal-Mart, was the biggest single case in the nation. The class action suit accused Wal-Mart of denying as many as 204,000 current and former California employees of pay for missed lunch and rest breaks. Federal law does not require meal or rest breaks, no matter how long the shift, although most employers provide some sort of meal break. But in states that don’t follow federal law, and have their own meal and rest break requirements, suits for denial of breaks have been brought in other states. Wal-Mart faces a similar lawsuit in Massachusetts. Despite the verdict against it, a spokesman for the retailer said, “Wal-Mart’s policy is to pay associates for every minute they work.” According to the lawyers who won the verdict in the Savaglio case, Wal-Mart continues to violate California law. Plaintiff’s lawyers want Wal-Mart to have a court-appointed supervisor to make sure they obey state wage laws. That issue will be decided this summer by a judge in the Alameda County, California Superior Court. According to The Recorder, Wal-Mart argues that the company is now complying with all meal and rest laws, and that court supervision is not needed. But the plaintiffs want the court to appoint a monitor to force Wal-Mart to undertake audits and report its compliance, and for the store to give its own employees notice of the injunction. The lawyers seek an additional $5 million in restitution for meal break violations between October and December 2000. The workers also want a court order preventing Wal-Mart from asking employees to sign away their right to meal breaks, something they say often occurs at the retailer under coercive conditions. The workers also say Wal-Mart should be required to stop using a system that automatically clocks employees in and out for their meal breaks, which hides the true duration of their lunch. They charge that Wal-Mart has a history of ignoring even its own studies showing it was not following the law. “Even today, after the jury in this case found Wal-Mart liable for punitive damages, Wal-Mart continues to violate specific provisions of both the California Labor Code and Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Orders,” the plaintiffs charge.
Wal-Mart claims that it has worked hard on the issue of meal and rest break compliance in its stores, making enhancements such as an automated procedure that keeps track of employee meal breaks. The company is also appealing the jury verdict from last December. In its 2006 Annual Report, Wal-Mart writes, “The Company believes that it has substantial defenses to the claims at issue, and intends to challenge the verdict in post-trial motions, and, if necessary, on appeal.”

Wal-Mart is also facing at least two lawsuits over its Associates’ incentive bonus plans in California. The company has settled one case, but says that financial settlement will “not have a material impact on the company’s financial condition or results of operations.” For a description of other Wal-Mart legal problems, go to their website, www.walmart.com, and look up their most recent annual report to the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC). In the document you will find a section title “litigation” which summarizes the company’s massive legal entanglements. You can also search Newflash by “legal” for similar stories.

Like this article?

Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on Linkdin
Share on pinterest
Share on Pinterest
Al Norman

Al Norman

Al Norman first achieved national attention in October of 1993 when he successfully stopped Wal-Mart from locating in his hometown of Greenfield, Massachusetts. Almost 3 decades later they is still not Wal-Mart in Greenfield. Norman has appeared on 60 Minutes, was featured in three films, wrote 3 books about Wal-Mart, and gained widespread media attention from the Wall Street Journal to Fortune magazine. Al has traveled throughout the U.S., Barbados, Puerto Rico, Ireland, and Japan, helping dozens of local coalitions fight off unwanted sprawl development. 60 Minutes called Al “the guru of the anti-Wal-Mart movement.”

Leave a comment

Find Us

  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, MA
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]m

Helpful Links

  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
Menu
  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

Recent Posts

CHRISTIAN SMALLS, FIRED AMZN WAREHOUSE WORKER, FILES RACE DISCRIMATION LAWSUIT. …

November 16, 2020

DUE TO THE SURGE IN CORONA CASES, WMT IS LIMITING SHOPPERS TO 5 PER 1,000 SF. A…

November 16, 2020

AMAZON RECENTLY ANNOUNCED FREE 1 HOUR GROCERY PICK UP FOR PRIME MEMBER ORDERS &g…

November 15, 2020

AFTER BEING REJECTED BY THE DEERFIELD, MA PLANNING BOARD, DOLLAR GENERAL APPEALS…

November 15, 2020

WILL TRUMP ALLOW ORACLE & WALMART TO INVEST IN TIK TOK? The deadline to ban …

November 14, 2020

AMAZON ACCUSED OF BREAKING ANTITRUST RULES IN EUROPE. “Data of 3rd-party sellers…

November 14, 2020

WALMART PET CARE NOW SELLING PET INSURANCE. My 3 year old mixed breed cat would …

November 13, 2020

WALMART’S GOING TO THE DOGS. 90 M OF ITS CUSTOMERS HAVE DOGS. You’d be Goofy not…

November 13, 2020

WALMART CASHIERS STILL LOOKING FOR A SEAT. They won a $65 M lawsuit in 2019, but…

November 12, 2020

4 DAYS BEFORE THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION,THE CO-FOUNDER OF HOME DEPOT SAID: “Pres…

November 12, 2020

Recent Tweets

Al Norman 18 hours ago

PGA VOTES TO CANCEL ITS GOLF CHAMPIONSHIP FROM TRUMP’S NJ COURSE NEXT YEAR. The British Open will not be played at a Trump property. This is worse than IMPEACHMENT! https://t.co/pJfG2PwhWf

Read More
Al Norman 18 hours ago

AMZN HAS APPEALED TO THE SCOTUS AN APPEALS COURT RULING IN JULY THAT ITS “LAST MILE” DRIVERS CAN SUE AMZN, BECAUSE THEY ARE EMPLOYEES DOING INTERSTATE COMMERCE—not independent contractors forced to rely on AMZN’S arbitration. https://t.co/08XnCczut2

Read More
Al Norman 2 days ago

AMAZON PROMISED “HUNDREDS OF JOBS” but the Boston Planning & Dev. Agency rejected an AMZN warehouse in So. Boston, because it “does not fit” their planning guidelines. $15/hr hardly a job. https://t.co/oZzY6wHS3q

Read More

Ⓒ 2020 - All Rights Are Reserved

Design and Development by Just Peachy Web Design

Download Our Free Guide

Download our Free Guide

Learn How To Stop Big Box Stores And Fulfillment Warehouses In Your Community

The strategies written here were produced by Sprawl-Busters in 2006 at the request of the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), mainly for citizen groups that were fighting Walmart. But the tips for fighting unwanted development apply to any project—whether its fighting Dollar General, an Amazon warehouse, or a Home Depot.

Big projects, or small, these BATTLEMART TIPS will help you better understand what you are up against, and how to win your battle.