Skip to content
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]
  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, Massachusetts
Sprawl-busters
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
  • Uncategorized

Voters Will Determine Fate of Wal-mart Project November 6th.

  • Al Norman
  • October 28, 2007
  • No Comments

Heber City, Utah voted in 2005 for a cap on the size of retail stores — but city officials in 2007 voted to give them a looser one — loose enough that it’s really no cap at all. On June 8, 2005, Sprawl-Busters reported that the City Council in Heber City had voted unanimously to set a size limitation of 60,000 s.f on stores that will keep retailers from building huge outlets in the city. During the two-hour public hearing in 2005, a majority of speakers urged the council not to jeopardize the small-town character of Heber City. “We need to have a cap [on retail floor space] to preserve our lifestyle,” one resident told the Salt Lake Tribune. “As soon as we bring in big-box, we’ll lose our tourist dollars. Who will want to come here if we’re just like Salt Lake?” But that wasn’t the end of the story. Heber Mayor Dave Phillips was concerned that shoppers were taking their money out of Heber to go to the big box stores, so in February, 2007, the City Council amended the ordinance to lift the limit to 150,000 s.f. — big enough to allow a Wal-Mart supercenter. As a result of that reversal of direction by the Mayor, a local group called “Put Heber Valley First” began collecting the 1,160 signatures needed to put the issue of a size cap on the city’s ballot in November. Voters will decide Nov. 6 whether they want a Wal-Mart off their Main Street. The question on the ballot asks if a new zone should be accepted allowing retail outlets larger than 60,000 square feet into the Wasatch County community. The Boyer Company development firm wants to build a 70-acre mixed-use development that, if voters approve, would include Wal-Mart as the anchor tenant. The Heber development would be a mix of single-family housing, and townhomes — all with a Wal-Mart for a view — that would be a buffer between the residents to the west and the commercial development. Wal-Mart opponents say that Heber City stands to losed its charm and local flavor if the superstore project is approved. According to the Deseret Morning News, the developer has been suggesting that Heber is losing $100 million a year in retail sales by Heber residents shopping in other towns. They argue that Wal-Mart will end this “leakage” of sales. “That’s what attracted us to Heber,” a spokesman for the developer told the Morning News. “You have this tremendous residential growth, but no retailers have moved into that marketplace and retail sales are just flat,” But the citizen’s group, Put Heber Valley First, say they don’t want to live in a place that is just like everywhere else. The group in April succeeded in collecting enough petition signatures for a voter referendum. “We’re not a city in trouble,” Matt Heimburger, spokesman for Put Heber Valley First, told the newspaper. “We’re a city in demand, we’re a city with options and choices, so why we’d rush to do the same old thing and change the rural nature of the place? I can’t figure it out. We’re doing this because we care about our community and want to see one of the most unique places in the West stay that way. It’s the wrong move for the town. It’s being pitched as though it’s inevitable, it has to happen, every town lets Wal-Mart in — but the truth is, not every town goes this direction. All the promises Boyer makes about increased taxes (revenues,) all the promises that are true positives can be achieved without big box.”

For years I have called the revenue figures used by developers “Wal-Math.” It’s a form of voodoo economics that shows only the revenues for towns — but not the expense. The jobs lost are never factored into the equation. But, as Sprawl-Busters warned on March 11, 2007, Put Heber Valley First will have to overcome Wal-Mart’s spending if it has any chance of winning on November 6th. The group has raised only $2,500 so far to battle the developer. Boyer is the same developer who faced a referendum against another Wal-Mart project in Sandy, Utah in 2005. Wal-Mart greatly outspent the citizens in Sandy, who still managed to get 47% of the vote — hardly a small ‘special interest’ group. This developer, Boyer, keeps building large projects near residentially zoned land, and these sites that are just not appropriate because they provide no real buffer for the surrounding properties. Wal-Mart relies on the outpouring of a great deal of money during the election to win the final tally. The corporation will prove whether or not Heber City is for sale to the highest bidder.

Like this article?

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Linkdin
Share on Pinterest
Picture of Al Norman

Al Norman

Al Norman first achieved national attention in October of 1993 when he successfully stopped Wal-Mart from locating in his hometown of Greenfield, Massachusetts. Almost 3 decades later they is still not Wal-Mart in Greenfield. Norman has appeared on 60 Minutes, was featured in three films, wrote 3 books about Wal-Mart, and gained widespread media attention from the Wall Street Journal to Fortune magazine. Al has traveled throughout the U.S., Barbados, Puerto Rico, Ireland, and Japan, helping dozens of local coalitions fight off unwanted sprawl development. 60 Minutes called Al “the guru of the anti-Wal-Mart movement.”

Leave a comment

Find Us

  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, MA
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]

Helpful Links

  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

Recent Posts

Facebook testing encrypted chat backups – CNBC

September 14, 2022

Facebook is shutting down its live shopping feature on October 1 – TechCrunch

September 14, 2022

Introducing Home and Feeds on Facebook – Facebook

September 14, 2022

Facebook to allow up to five profiles tied to one account – Reuters

September 14, 2022

Facebook tells managers to identify low performers in memo – The Washington Post

September 14, 2022

Meta is dumping Facebook logins as its metaverse ID system – TechCrunch

September 14, 2022

Introducing Features to Quickly Find and Connect with Facebook Groups – Facebook

September 14, 2022

Facebook plans ‘discovery engine’ feed change to compete with TikTok – The Verge

September 14, 2022

Wow, Facebook really knows how to give someone a send-off! – TechCrunch

September 14, 2022

Here’s What You Need to Know About Our Updated Privacy Policy and Terms of Service – Facebook

September 14, 2022

Recent Tweets

Ⓒ 2020 - All Rights Are Reserved

Design and Development by Just Peachy Web Design

Download Our Free Guide

Download our Free Guide

Learn How To Stop Big Box Stores And Fulfillment Warehouses In Your Community

The strategies written here were produced by Sprawl-Busters in 2006 at the request of the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), mainly for citizen groups that were fighting Walmart. But the tips for fighting unwanted development apply to any project—whether its fighting Dollar General, an Amazon warehouse, or a Home Depot.

Big projects, or small, these BATTLEMART TIPS will help you better understand what you are up against, and how to win your battle.