Skip to content
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]
  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, Massachusetts
Sprawl-busters
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
  • Uncategorized

California’s Lawmakers Want Public Pension To Drop Wal-Mart Stock

  • Al Norman
  • November 3, 2004
  • No Comments

Wal-Mart money helped defeat Proposition 72 in the November 2nd California election, but the retailer could win the battle yet lose the larger war. Prop 72 was a proposal requiring large businesses in California to provide health insurance for its workers, or pay into a state pool to fund health coverage. The measure was narrowly defeated by a vote of 50.9% against, to 49.1% in favor. The measure had been passed already by the California General Assembly, but was put before the general electorate. “Citizen” Wal-Mart stepped in to help finance the anti-Prop 72 when the measure’s supporters began running TV ads focusing on Wal-Mart as the poster child for companies that leave their workers without adequate health coverage. The pro-Prop 72 ads said that many low-paid workers turn to hospital emergency rooms for their routine health care needs. Wal-Mart responded angrily, and said it provides affordable health care coverage to its employees. “Like the rest of the business community, we are pleased voters rejected Prop. 72,” a Wal-Mart spokesperson said. “As one of California’s leading employers, we care about the health of our 60,000 employees here. That’s why we provide our employees with affordable, quality health care coverage. We certainly support the goal of affordable health care for all Californians… Prop. 72 was never about Wal-Mart. It was about allowing businesses to operate without unreasonable government mandates, it was about the survival of small businesses, and it was about consumer choice in health care benefits. California voters agreed, rejecting what would have been an extremely expensive, government-mandated health care plan.” But Wal-Mart’s funding of the anti-Prop 72 measure angered many state lawmakers. Less than a week before the election, several California Assembly members told the media they would hold hearings to investigate claims that Wal-Mart burdens the state with an unfair portion of the retailer’s employee health-care costs. Members of the Senate Budget Committee also raised the issue of whether California’s pension fund, CalPERS should consider selling off its estimated $1 billion worth of Wal-Mart stock because of the company’s policies. “The Senate Budget Committee will, as part of the budget process next year, investigate the extent that Wal-Mart does not provide coverage, and the extent that California taxpayers then pay for care for Wal-Mart’s workers,” said Senate Budget Committee chairman Wes Chesbro. “We need to figure out if Wal-Mart is not paying their fair share into the health care system on which we all rely.” Wal-Mart’s aggressive funding of the anti Prop 72 effort, and the call for CalPERS to divest its Wal-Mart stock were seen as politically related events. Wal-Mart kicked in $500,000 to defeat Prop 72. CalPERS is the nation’s No. 1 pension fund, which owns an estimated 18.8 million shares of Wal-Mart stock worth more than $1 billion. Ironically, CalPERS supported Prop 72.

In a related move, Mexican activists have approached TIAA-CREF, a retiremenet services group, to consider taking some action against Wal-Mart in response to the retailer’s building of a store roughly one mile from the historic Teotihuacan pyramid near Mexico City. Activist Jaime Lagunez flew to New York this week to meet with TIAA-CREF officials. Lagunez asked TIAA-CREF to consider divesting their Wal-Mart stock, or at least remove it from the socially responsible investing portfolio. If funds like TIAA-CREF, and CalPERS were to sell their Wal-Mart stock, it would send a powerful message that Wal-Mart should pay more attention to the needs of local communities, and not carry out projects that arouse major local opposition.

Like this article?

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Linkdin
Share on Pinterest
Picture of Al Norman

Al Norman

Al Norman first achieved national attention in October of 1993 when he successfully stopped Wal-Mart from locating in his hometown of Greenfield, Massachusetts. Almost 3 decades later they is still not Wal-Mart in Greenfield. Norman has appeared on 60 Minutes, was featured in three films, wrote 3 books about Wal-Mart, and gained widespread media attention from the Wall Street Journal to Fortune magazine. Al has traveled throughout the U.S., Barbados, Puerto Rico, Ireland, and Japan, helping dozens of local coalitions fight off unwanted sprawl development. 60 Minutes called Al “the guru of the anti-Wal-Mart movement.”

Leave a comment

Find Us

  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, MA
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]

Helpful Links

  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

Recent Posts

Facebook testing encrypted chat backups – CNBC

September 14, 2022

Facebook is shutting down its live shopping feature on October 1 – TechCrunch

September 14, 2022

Introducing Home and Feeds on Facebook – Facebook

September 14, 2022

Facebook to allow up to five profiles tied to one account – Reuters

September 14, 2022

Facebook tells managers to identify low performers in memo – The Washington Post

September 14, 2022

Meta is dumping Facebook logins as its metaverse ID system – TechCrunch

September 14, 2022

Introducing Features to Quickly Find and Connect with Facebook Groups – Facebook

September 14, 2022

Facebook plans ‘discovery engine’ feed change to compete with TikTok – The Verge

September 14, 2022

Wow, Facebook really knows how to give someone a send-off! – TechCrunch

September 14, 2022

Here’s What You Need to Know About Our Updated Privacy Policy and Terms of Service – Facebook

September 14, 2022

Recent Tweets

Ⓒ 2020 - All Rights Are Reserved

Design and Development by Just Peachy Web Design

Download Our Free Guide

Download our Free Guide

Learn How To Stop Big Box Stores And Fulfillment Warehouses In Your Community

The strategies written here were produced by Sprawl-Busters in 2006 at the request of the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), mainly for citizen groups that were fighting Walmart. But the tips for fighting unwanted development apply to any project—whether its fighting Dollar General, an Amazon warehouse, or a Home Depot.

Big projects, or small, these BATTLEMART TIPS will help you better understand what you are up against, and how to win your battle.