Skip to content
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]
  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, Massachusetts
Sprawl-busters
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
  • Uncategorized

Wal-Mart Slammed for Lobbying Against Port Security

  • Al Norman
  • March 29, 2007
  • No Comments

Community activists this week charged that Wal-Mart and other retailers are placing their profits ahead of national security. The group Wake Up Wal-Mart, helped coordinate a national effort in more than 15 states called “Wal-Mart, Put America’s Security First.” The group held a press conference at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard on March 22, calling on Wal-Mart, America’s largest private importer of port containers, to stop lobbying against 100% scanning of port containers coming into this country. U.S. ports are considered to be a weak link in the chain of this country’s defense against terrorism, because only 5% of the port containers coming into the country are scanned for content. Wal-Mart has been aggressively lobbying against 100% scanning of port containers, despite the explicit threat to homeland security unscreened containers pose. The group says that another Wal-Mart container enters the U.S. every 45 seconds. To counter Wal-Mart lobbying campaign, Wake Up Wal-Mart produced its own TV spot, critical of Wal-Mart’s efforts to block heightened security. One of the events in New England was held at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard. “Profits should not come at the expense of security,” Tom Carvalho of the United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1445 told reporters in Portsmouth. Wal-Mart responded quickly to this new campaign. “Wal-Mart is proud of our efforts to ensure a more secure supply chain, and we will continue to play a central role in defining real solutions to enhance cargo security,” the company said. “This union-funded ad is in poor taste and an irresponsible attempt to avoid the facts, play upon people’s fears and disparage our company and its 1.8 million associates worldwide. “We’re not here to stick a stick in Wal-Mart’s eye,” Carvalho told the Union Leader newspaper. “We’re here to make them a responsible corporation.” Although other importers are lobbying against container safety, Wal-Mart is the largest importer of foreign products in America. “When you’re in the fight, you pick the biggest dog,” said Paul O’Connor, president of the Metal Trades Council, the shipyard’s largest union. Republican Congresswoman Carol Shea-Porter of New Hamphire, released a statement at the rally which said, “We live in a dangerous world, and leaving 95% of containers unscanned makes it even more dangerous. For example, the unsecured nuclear material in the former Soviet Union could be purchased by terrorists and end up in a container bound for one of our major ports. It’s the responsibility of all Americans -including our corporate citizens – to protect the public from such nightmare scenarios. Indeed, it’s our and their patriotic duty.”

In April of 2006, Wal-Mart faced similar charges from the AFL-CIO about the security of our ports. At that time, Wal-Mart said it supported 100% screening of containers. “The fact is,” Wal-Mart said a year ago, “we and other retailers have played a critical role since 9/11 in working toward real solutions to enhance port security – from supporting 100% screening of containers, to testing new technologies and ways to identify container tampering. We are working closely with Congress and the Administration to find the best ways to improve supply chain security.” Wal-Mart said it wanted better background security checks of dock workers. The public events around the country this week have put Wal-Mart on the defensive again for an action that normally might have escaped public notice. Most citizens have no idea how much lobbying companies like Wal-Mart and Home Depot do before Congress. Whether it’s importing Chinese fans, or international trade rules, these big retailers wield a big stick in Washington, D.C. In this case, Wal-Mart was asked bluntly to “help stop the next 9/11. “Wal-Mart has a simple choice to make,” Carvalho from the UFCW explained. “What is more important — Wal-Mart’s profits, or America’s security? Sadly, for Wal-Mart, we know the answer is profits first and America’s security second. Even if it cost $100 to scan each container, it would only raise the cost of the goods inside by .2 percent,” he said. Instead of dealing with the message of this criticism, Wal-Mart decided to attack the messenger. The company called this week’s activities “a desperate campaign that is rooted in politics and nothing else.” The U.S. House of Representatives has passed H.R. 1, which implements the 9/11 Commission Recommendations Act of 2007, requiring 100% scanning of cargo containers bound for the United States. The U.S. Senate is currently debating its version of the 9/11 bill.

Like this article?

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Linkdin
Share on Pinterest
Picture of Al Norman

Al Norman

Al Norman first achieved national attention in October of 1993 when he successfully stopped Wal-Mart from locating in his hometown of Greenfield, Massachusetts. Almost 3 decades later they is still not Wal-Mart in Greenfield. Norman has appeared on 60 Minutes, was featured in three films, wrote 3 books about Wal-Mart, and gained widespread media attention from the Wall Street Journal to Fortune magazine. Al has traveled throughout the U.S., Barbados, Puerto Rico, Ireland, and Japan, helping dozens of local coalitions fight off unwanted sprawl development. 60 Minutes called Al “the guru of the anti-Wal-Mart movement.”

Leave a comment

Find Us

  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, MA
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]

Helpful Links

  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

Recent Posts

Facebook testing encrypted chat backups – CNBC

September 14, 2022

Facebook is shutting down its live shopping feature on October 1 – TechCrunch

September 14, 2022

Introducing Home and Feeds on Facebook – Facebook

September 14, 2022

Facebook to allow up to five profiles tied to one account – Reuters

September 14, 2022

Facebook tells managers to identify low performers in memo – The Washington Post

September 14, 2022

Meta is dumping Facebook logins as its metaverse ID system – TechCrunch

September 14, 2022

Introducing Features to Quickly Find and Connect with Facebook Groups – Facebook

September 14, 2022

Facebook plans ‘discovery engine’ feed change to compete with TikTok – The Verge

September 14, 2022

Wow, Facebook really knows how to give someone a send-off! – TechCrunch

September 14, 2022

Here’s What You Need to Know About Our Updated Privacy Policy and Terms of Service – Facebook

September 14, 2022

Recent Tweets

Ⓒ 2020 - All Rights Are Reserved

Design and Development by Just Peachy Web Design

Download Our Free Guide

Download our Free Guide

Learn How To Stop Big Box Stores And Fulfillment Warehouses In Your Community

The strategies written here were produced by Sprawl-Busters in 2006 at the request of the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), mainly for citizen groups that were fighting Walmart. But the tips for fighting unwanted development apply to any project—whether its fighting Dollar General, an Amazon warehouse, or a Home Depot.

Big projects, or small, these BATTLEMART TIPS will help you better understand what you are up against, and how to win your battle.