Skip to content
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]
  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, Massachusetts
Sprawl-busters
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Home Towns, Not Home Depot
    • The Case Against Sprawl
  • Victories
  • Blog
    • Share Your Battle
  • Contact
  • Uncategorized

Warren Buffet And Waltons Should Pay City To Clean Up Their Mess

  • Al Norman
  • April 6, 2013
  • No Comments

Two of the richest families on the planet — the Waltons and the Buffetts — have taken public welfare from taxpayers to help clean up contaminated land that will soon sprout a Wal-Mart superstore.

On April 10th, the Walton Family will open another superstore on a piece of property left polluted by a company Warren Buffett acquired. This ribbon cutting would not have been possible without a financial “gift” to the billionaires — courtesy of the taxpayers of South Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

A 115,000 square foot Wal-Mart was approved on a 6-2 vote by the South Milwaukee Common Council in October of 2011. The only two aldermen who voted against the project represented the district that includes the development site. The land itself was environmentally contaminated, and the corporation responsible for the pollution is linked to Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway “family” of companies.

To make this $12 million big box project work, city officials had to rezone one property from manufacturing to commercial, vacate a city street, spend $2.5 million to acquire a string of parcels — and chip in to clean up pollution on the property. The site sits over a former wetland and a creek mere blocks from the shores of Lake Michigan. The land was contaminated with tannery toxins such as hexavalent chrome — the carcinogen that made Erin Brockovich a household name.

It took the city 7 years to assemble 7 parcels, which it then sold to a developer for roughly 20 percent of what it cost taxpayers to buy and clean up. Part of the sale agreement required the developer to clean up the site. But city officials thought the Walton’s might need some financial help to swing the deal.

The cost to handle the contamination for the western site was estimated at over $2 million. The company that polluted the site was “consolidated” through several holding companies — into Berkshire Hathaway. Warren Buffett also happens to be a major Wal-Mart stockholder. He went on a Wal-Mart buying binge between 2009 and 2012, adding 26.7 million shares to his portfolio.

The corporations pitching this Wal-Mart had far deeper pockets than the taxpayers of South Milwaukee, a community of just over 21,000 people, with an annual budget of only $18.5 million. Warren Buffett is the third richest man in the world with a net worth of $50 billion — enough to pay for South Milwaukee’s budget for the next 2,700 years — not counting inflation. The heirs of Sam Walton have a total net worth of $107 billion.

When corporations pollute, just try to find a board of directors willing to accept responsibility. In this case, a company called Midwest Tanning operated on the site for sixty years. It closed its doors at the South Milwaukee plant in July, 2001. Industrial trash was still piled outside the building ten years later. Midwest’s operations were consolidated with a sister company, Paul Flagg Leather Company, which were both part of the Midwest Leather Group of companies owned by Wells Lamont.

Wells Lamont was purchased by the Marmon Group of Companies, and in 2008, Berkshire Hathaway purchased controlling interest in Marmon, making Wells Lamont a part of the Berkshire Hathaway companies. This sequence of entities swallowing entities, is a corporate version of the Russian nesting dolls. The original polluter is hidden by larger corporate dolls, and the city is left holding the (contaminated) bag.

Instead of asking the billionaires to clean up their act, South Milwaukee Alderman shifted part of the tab to city taxpayers. They created a TIF — a Tax Incremental Financing District. Wisconsin has allowed TIFs since 1975. They are basically a financing mechanism that earmarks property tax payments for site improvements that inure to the benefit of the developer.

Warren Buffett did not offer to pay for the South Milwaukee contamination deposited by his consolidated company. The Walton family did not offer to scrub every ounce of pollution from their site. Instead, the city of South Milwaukee diverted $1.8 million in tax revenues to improve Wal-Mart’s holdings. Such subsidies are a source of consternation to smaller businesses who get no such municipal candy. The TIF money could have gone to defray other costs in the city budget, like public safety, schools, or the library.

Dean Chapman, a South Milwaukee businessman, vigorously opposed the Wal-Mart-and-welfare deal. When he realized the Midwest Tanning connection to Berkshire Hathaway, he reached out to Warren Buffett. “I naively hoped Mr. Buffett would welcome the positive spin of paying for his division’s mess,” Chapman told me. “But I never got a reply. I even tried his son Peter, who I’d met when he lived in Milwaukee and shared mutual friends. Then I tried his son Howard, whose passion is responsible land use. Not one response.”

“I felt like a fool when I learned Berkshire Hathaway was a major Wal-Mart stockholder,” Chapman recalls. “By then, the Wal-Mart was already breaking ground. One of these billionaire’s families should refund the hard-working taxpayers the $1.8 million tab we got handed.”

Over the past couple of years, this project was bitterly fought by two citizens groups. Sidewalk rallies were held. Legislation and litigation was filed. The public hearings on the plan were described as “very heated” in the local media. More than 200 citizens packed the Common Council hearing room on the night the project was approved.

But one year and five months later — another Wal-Mart store will open in South Milwaukee — literally built on a foundation of corporate welfare. These subsidies for the rich can be a very dirty business sometimes.

Readers are urged to email South Milwaukee Mayor Tom Zepecki at: [email protected] with the following message:

“Dear Mayor Zepecki,

Now that you have a new Wal-Mart opening, it’s time for you as Mayor to ask the corporation to pony up for the full cost of remediating that site. It is the taxpayers of your city who got skinned and tanned from the contamination left by 60 years of Midwest Tanning activities.

There should be some corporate accountability for the pollution of that site. Instead, you asked your own taxpayers to clean up after the corporations. Berkshire Hathaway owns Wells Lamont — and you have every right to send them the bill for the clean up.

The principle is very simple: companies that come into our community and leave a mess, should pay to clean it up. The taxpayers in South Milwaukee should be compensated for every penny they spent on this clean up, and for the full value of the land you sold so cheaply.”

Two of the richest families on the planet — the Waltons and the Buffetts — have taken public welfare from taxpayers to help clean up contaminated land that will soon sprout a Wal-Mart superstore.

Like this article?

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Linkdin
Share on Pinterest
Picture of Al Norman

Al Norman

Al Norman first achieved national attention in October of 1993 when he successfully stopped Wal-Mart from locating in his hometown of Greenfield, Massachusetts. Almost 3 decades later they is still not Wal-Mart in Greenfield. Norman has appeared on 60 Minutes, was featured in three films, wrote 3 books about Wal-Mart, and gained widespread media attention from the Wall Street Journal to Fortune magazine. Al has traveled throughout the U.S., Barbados, Puerto Rico, Ireland, and Japan, helping dozens of local coalitions fight off unwanted sprawl development. 60 Minutes called Al “the guru of the anti-Wal-Mart movement.”

Leave a comment

Find Us

  • 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield, MA
  • (413) 834-4284
  • [email protected]

Helpful Links

  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

Recent Posts

Facebook testing encrypted chat backups – CNBC

September 14, 2022

Facebook is shutting down its live shopping feature on October 1 – TechCrunch

September 14, 2022

Introducing Home and Feeds on Facebook – Facebook

September 14, 2022

Facebook to allow up to five profiles tied to one account – Reuters

September 14, 2022

Facebook tells managers to identify low performers in memo – The Washington Post

September 14, 2022

Meta is dumping Facebook logins as its metaverse ID system – TechCrunch

September 14, 2022

Introducing Features to Quickly Find and Connect with Facebook Groups – Facebook

September 14, 2022

Facebook plans ‘discovery engine’ feed change to compete with TikTok – The Verge

September 14, 2022

Wow, Facebook really knows how to give someone a send-off! – TechCrunch

September 14, 2022

Here’s What You Need to Know About Our Updated Privacy Policy and Terms of Service – Facebook

September 14, 2022

Recent Tweets

Ⓒ 2020 - All Rights Are Reserved

Design and Development by Just Peachy Web Design

Download Our Free Guide

Download our Free Guide

Learn How To Stop Big Box Stores And Fulfillment Warehouses In Your Community

The strategies written here were produced by Sprawl-Busters in 2006 at the request of the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), mainly for citizen groups that were fighting Walmart. But the tips for fighting unwanted development apply to any project—whether its fighting Dollar General, an Amazon warehouse, or a Home Depot.

Big projects, or small, these BATTLEMART TIPS will help you better understand what you are up against, and how to win your battle.